Managing Hybridity in a Changing Welfare Mix: Everyday Practices in an Entrepreneurial Nonprofit in Belgium

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Lesley Hustinx ; Els De Waele
• 关键词：Hybridization ; Post ; corporatist welfare regimes ; Third sector organizations ; Hybrid organizations ; Institutional logics approach ; Participant observation
• 刊名：Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：October 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：26
• 期：5
• 页码：1666-1689
• 全文大小：464 KB
• 参考文献：Anheier, H. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.
  Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations-creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory & Society, 36(6), 547-71.CrossRef
  Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346-59.CrossRef
  Bode, I. (2008). The culture of welfare markets: The international recasting of pension and care systems. New York: Routledge.
  Bode, I. (2010). Creeping marketization and post-corporatist governance: The transformation of state-nonprofit relations in continental Europe. In S. D. Phillips & S. R. Smith (Eds.), Governance and regulation in the third sector: International perspectives (pp. 115-41). New York: Routledge.
  Bode, I. (2013). In futile search of excellence: The ‘muddling through agenda-of service-providing social enterprises in contemporary Europe. In S. Denny & F. Seddon (Eds.), Social enterprise: Accountability and evaluation around the world (pp. 196-12). New York: Routledge.
  Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. London: SAGE.
  Dees, J. G. (1998, January–February). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 55-7.
  Decreet van 21 maart 2003 betreffende de armoedebestrijding [Decree of March 21 2003 concerning poverty reduction] (Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap), Belgisch Staatsblad, 11 juni 2003 (editie 2), 31567.
  Eikenberry, A. M., & Drapal, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-40.CrossRef
  Eliasoph, N. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
  Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-0), 737-48.CrossRef
  Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  Fuller, S., Kershaw, P., & Pulkingham, J. (2008). Constructing ‘active citizenship- Single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism. Citizenship Studies, 12(2), 157-76.CrossRef
  Garrow, E., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2012). Managing conflicting institutional logics: Social service versus market. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective (pp. 121-43). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Gidron, B. (2014). Market-oriented social enterprises employing people with disabilities: A participants-perspective. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 60-6.CrossRef
  Gl?nzel, G., & Schmitz, B. (2010). Organizational hybridity concept and hybrid organizations typology. Working Paper, ARNOVA.
  Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micellota, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 1-5.
  Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 458-01.CrossRef
  Homan, R. (2001). The principle of assumed consent: The ethics of gatekeeping. Journal of philosophy of Education, 35(3), 329-43.CrossRef
  Hustinx, L., De Waele, E., & Delcour, C. (2015). Hybridisation in a corporatist third sector regime: Paradoxes of ‘responsibilised autonomy- Voluntary Sector Review. doi:10.-332/-04080515X143576-0822877 .
  Hustinx, L., Verschuere, B., & De Corte, J. (2014). Organisational hybridity in a post-corporatist welfare mix: The case of the third sector in Belgium. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 391-11.CrossRef
  Knutsen, W. L. (2012). Adapted institutional logics of contemporary nonprofit organizations. Administration & Society, 44(8), 985-013.CrossRef
  Lie, M., & Baines, S. (2007). Making sense of organizational change: Voices of older volunteers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(3), 225-40.CrossRef
  Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-8.CrossRef
  Markstr?m, U., & Karlsson, M. (2013). Towards hybridization: The roles of Swedish non-profit organizations within mental health. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(4), 917-34.CrossRef
  Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-63.CrossRef
  Minkoff, D. (2002). The emerge
• 作者单位：Lesley Hustinx (1)
  Els De Waele (1)
  
  1. Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Korte Meer 3-5, Ghent, Belgium
  
• 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
• 刊物主题：Social Sciences
  Social Sciences
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-7888

文摘

This article departs from the observation of a widely heralded shift in the governance of welfare, which is claimed to represent a more complex and uncertain institutional environment for third sector organizations (TSOs). It has been argued that hybrid organizations carry innovative potential compared to traditional nonprofits in terms of more effectively or creatively dealing with contradictory pressures from multiple institutional logics. Using a recently developed theory to study nonprofit hybrids, this paper explores the concrete organizational practice of ‘managing hybridity.-A qualitative study of institutional logics and participant interactions in a purposively sampled ‘post-corporatist-hybrid TSO in Belgium was conducted. Our analysis first revealed that at the organization-level, our case represented a blended nonprofit hybrid. The particular combination of competing logics, however, put complex demands on staff members, who used three types of coping strategies in their everyday routines. A managerial and service logic prevailed, at the expense of the TSO's participatory and emancipatory mission. Implications of the findings for nascent theorizing on nonprofit hybrids are discussed. Keywords Hybridization Post-corporatist welfare regimes Third sector organizations Hybrid organizations Institutional logics approach Participant observation