A comparison of criteria for diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in children
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Zbigniew Samochocki (1)
    Jowita Dejewska (2)
  • 关键词:atopic dermatitis ; diagnosis ; Williams criteria
  • 刊名:World Journal of Pediatrics
  • 出版年:2012
  • 出版时间:November 2012
  • 年:2012
  • 卷:8
  • 期:4
  • 页码:355-358
  • 全文大小:184KB
  • 参考文献:1. Williams H, Flohr C. How epidemiology has challenged 3 prevailing concepts about atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:209-13. CrossRef
    2. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1483-494. CrossRef
    3. Rudzki E, Samochocki Z, Rebandel P, Saciuk E, Ga?ecki W, Raczka A, et al. Frequency and significance of the major and minor features of Hanifin and Rajka among patients with atopic dermatitis. Dermatology 1994;189:41-6. CrossRef
    4. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica 1980;suppl.92:44-7.
    5. Williams HC, Burney PG, Pembroke AC, Hay RJ. The U.K. Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:406-16. CrossRef
    6. De D, Kanwar AJ, Handa S. Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria and the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:853-59.
    7. B?hme M, Svensson A, Kull I, Nordvall SL, Wahlgren CF. Clinical features of atopic dermatitis at two years of age: a prospective, population-based case-control study. Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:193-97. CrossRef
    8. Wisuthsarewong W, Viravan S. Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Thai children. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:1496-500.
    9. Popescu CM, Popescu R, Williams H, Forsea D. Community validation of the United Kingdom diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Romanian schoolchildren. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:436-42. CrossRef
    10. Kang KF, Tian RM. Atopic dermatitis. An evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings. Int J Dermatol 1987;26:27-2. CrossRef
    11. Kanwar AJ, Dhar S, Kaur S. Evaluation of minor clinical features of atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 1991;8:114-16. CrossRef
    12. Nagaraja, Kanwar AJ, Dhar S, Singh S. Frequency and significance of minor clinical features in various age-related subgroups of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatr Dermatol 1996;13:10-3. CrossRef
    13. B?hme M, Svensson A, Kull I, Wahlgren CF. Hanifin’s and Rajka’s minor criteria for atopic dermatitis: which do 2-yearolds exhibit? J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43(5 Pt 1):785-92. CrossRef
    14. Lee HJ, Cho SH, Ha SJ, Ahn WK, Park YM, Byun DG, et al. Minor cutaneous features oatopic dermatitis in South Korea. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:337-42. CrossRef
    15. Eigenmann PA. Clinical features and diagnostic criteria of atopic dermatitis in relation to age. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001;12:69-4. CrossRef
    16. Gu H, Chen XS, Chen K, Yan Y, Jing H, Chen XQ, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: validity of the criteria of Williams et al. in a hospitalbased setting. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:428-33. CrossRef
    17. Brenninkmeijer EE, Schram ME, Leeflang MM, Bos JD, Spuls PI. Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:754-65. CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Zbigniew Samochocki (1)
    Jowita Dejewska (2)

    1. Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Koszykowa 82A, Warsaw, 02-008, Poland
    2. Department of Dermatology, Central Clinical Hospital of Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Szaserów 128, Warsaw, 00-909, Poland
文摘
Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosis in children gives rise to many problems. Although the Hanifin and Rajka criteria are acknowledged and used universally in diagnosing AD, their evaluation is a major source of difficulty in pediatrician’s daily practice. The simplified criteria, revised by Williams et al, seem to be more useful and represent the most common clinical manifestations of AD. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the two different criteria for diagnosing AD in children. Methods This study involved 250 children with AD. All of the patients underwent clinical examinations and the diagnostic procedures according to the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka as well as those of Williams. Results According to the Hanifin-Rajka criteria, AD was diagnosed in 173 children, of whom 153 were diagnosed positive by the criteria of Williams. Among the 77 children who were diagnosed without AD according to the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, 4 were detected with AD by the Williams criteria. Four children with scabies and seborrhoeic dermatitis were misdiagnosed as having AD according to the Williams criteria due to the atypical locations of their lesions and the histories of asthma or hay fever and xerosis. Conclusions Although the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka are the gold standard for diagnosing AD, the Williams criteria are also very useful in children older than 4 years. The most useful Williams criteria for AD diagnosis in children is pruritus with history of lesions in characteristic locations and history of generally dry skin. The significant increase in the detectability of AD is found by raising the borderline age for the first skin lesion development from 2 to 5 years of age.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700