LCA-based study on structural retrofit options for masonry buildings

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Loredana Napolano (1) (2)
  Costantino Menna (1)
  Domenico Asprone (1)
  Andrea Prota (1)
  Gaetano Manfredi (1)
  
  1. Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture ; University ofNaples ; Federico II ; Via Claudio 21 ; 80125 ; Naples ; Italy
  2. Stress S.c.ar.l. Sviluppo Tecnologie e Ricerca per l鈥橢dilizia sismicamente Sicura ed ecoSostenibile ; vico II S.Nicola alla Dogana 9 ; 80133 ; Naples ; Italy
  
• 关键词：Local replacement ; Masonry structures ; Mortar injection ; Reinforced grid ; Steel chain ; Structural retrofit
• 刊名：The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：January 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：20
• 期：1
• 页码：23-35
• 全文大小：2,838 KB
• 参考文献：1. AFV Beltrame Group (2012) Environmental product declaration of manufacturing plants. Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V. (IBU) Declaration nr. S-P-00252
  2. Allacker K (2012) Environmental and economic optimization of the floor on grade in residential buildings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:813鈥?27 CrossRef
  3. Asadi E, da Silva MG et al (2012) Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: a model and an application. Energ Build 44:81鈥?7 CrossRef
  4. Ascione F, de Rossi F et al (2011) Energy retrofit of historical buildings: theoretical and experimental investigations for the modelling of reliable performance scenarios. Energ Build 43(8):1925鈥?936 CrossRef
  5. Biek拧aa D, 艩iup拧inskas G et al (2011) Energy efficiency challenges in multi-apartment building renovation in Lithuania. J Civ Eng Manag 17(4):467鈥?75 CrossRef
  6. Bosiljkov V, Uranjek M et al (2010) An integrated diagnostic approach for the assessment of historic masonry structures. J Cult Herit 11(3):239鈥?49 CrossRef
  7. Boylu M (2005) A benefit/cost analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Izmir. 陌zmir Institute of Technology, 陌zmir, p 206
  8. Chen MZ, Lin JT et al (2011) Utilization of recycled brick powder as alternative filler in asphalt mixture. Construct Build Mater 25(4):1532鈥?536 CrossRef
  9. Circolare n. 617 (2009) Istruzioni per l鈥檃pplicazione delle 鈥楴uove norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008
  10. CNR-DT 200 (2004) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP system for strengthening existing structures. Rome 13/07/2004
  11. Das S (2011) Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(3):268鈥?82 CrossRef
  12. DOCC&EE (2011) Securing a clean energy future - The australian government鈥檚 climate change plan. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Commonwealth of Australia - ISBN 978-0-642-74723-5
  13. Flourentzou F, Roulet CA (2002) Elaboration of retrofit scenarios. Energ Build 34(2):185鈥?92 CrossRef
  14. Foxon TJ, Mcilkenny G et al (2002) Sustainability criteria for decision support in the UK water industry. J Environ Plann Manag 45(2):285鈥?01 CrossRef
  15. Hedemann J, K枚nig U (2007) Technical documentation of the ecoinvent database. Final report ecoinvent data v2.2 No. 4, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, D眉bendorf, Switzerland
  16. HUD/U.S. (2005) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Washington, DC 20410鈥?000 - MORTGAGEE LETTER 2005鈥?0: Enhancements to 鈥淪treamlined (k)鈥?Limited Repair Program
  17. ISO:14025 (2006) Environmental labels and declarations鈥攖ype III environmental declarations鈥攑rinciples and procedures, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
  18. ISO:14040 (2006) Environmental management鈥攍ife cycle assessment鈥攑rinciples and framework, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
  19. ISO:14044 (2006) Environmental management鈥攍ife cycle assessment鈥攔equirements and guidelines, ISO - International Organization for Standardization
  20. Juan Y-K, Kim JH et al (2009) GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies. Autom Constr 18(4):394鈥?01 CrossRef
  21. Kanapeckiene L, Kaklauskas A et al (2011) Method and system for multi-attribute market value assessment in analysis of construction and retrofit projects. Expert Syst Appl 38(11):14196鈥?4207
  22. Ma Z, Cooper P, Daly D, Ledo L (2012) Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energ Build 55:889鈥?02 CrossRef
  23. Menna C, Asprone D et al (2013) Assessment of ecological sustainability of a building subjected to potential seismic events during its lifetime. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:504鈥?15 CrossRef
  24. MIT (2014) Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (Italy) - DECRETO-LEGGE 28 marzo 2014, n. 47 Misure urgenti per l鈥檈mergenza abitativa, per il mercato delle costruzioni e per Expo 2015. (14G00059) (GU n.73 del 28-3-2014)
  25. Moliner E, Fabregat J, Cseh M, Vidal R (2013) Life cycle assessment of a fibre-reinforced polymer made of glass fibre phenolic resin with brominated flame retardant. 1st Symposium of the Spanish LCA Network: LCA & Bioenergy, 2013
  26. NTC (2008) NTC, Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, D.M 14 gennaio 2008
  27. Perini K (2013) Retrofitting with vegetation recent building heritage applying a design tool鈥攖he case study of a school building. Front Architect Res 2(3):267鈥?77 CrossRef
  28. Raslanasa S, Alchimovien臈a J et al (2011) Residential areas with apartment houses: analysis of the condition of buildings, planning issues, retrofit strategies and scenarios. Int J Strat Prop Manag 15(2):152鈥?72 CrossRef
  29. ReLuis (2011) (Rete dei Laboratori Universitari di Ingegneria Sismica), linee guida per riparazione e rafforzamento di elementi strutturali, tamponature e partizioni, www.reluis.it/doc/pdf/Linee_guida1.pdf
  30. Rodrigues C, Freire F (2014) Integrated life-cycle assessment and thermal dynamic simulation of alternative scenarios for the roof retrofit of a house. Build Environ 81:204鈥?15 CrossRef
  31. Sahely HR, Kennedy CA, Adams BJ (2005) Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Can J Civ Eng 32(1):71鈥?5 CrossRef
  32. UNI EN 1015鈥?9 (2008) Methods of test for mortar for masonry鈥攑art 19: determination of water vapour permeability of hardened rendering and plastering mortars
  33. UNI EN 13242 (2002) Aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound materials for use in civil engineering work and road construction
  34. UNI EN 15804 (2012) Sustainability of construction works鈥攅nvironmental product declarations鈥攃ore rules for the product category of construction products
  35. UNI EN 998鈥? (2004) Specification for mortar for masonry鈥攎asonry mortar
  36. U啪拧ilaitytea L, Martinaitis V (2010) Search for optimal solution of public building renovation in terms of life cycle. J Environ Eng Landsc 18(2):102鈥?10 CrossRef
  37. Waheed B, Khan F et al (2009) Linkage-based frameworks for sustainability assessment: making a case for driving force-pressure-state-exposure-effect-action (DPSEEA) frameworks. Sustainability 1:441鈥?63 CrossRef
  38. Wu S, Zhu J et al (2011) Experimental investigation on related properties of asphalt mastic containing recycled red brick powder. Construct Build Mater 25(6):2883鈥?88 CrossRef
  39. Xing Y, Hewitt N, Griffiths P (2011) Zero carbon buildings refurbishment鈥攁 hierarchical pathway. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3229鈥?236 CrossRef
  40. Zhang C, Lin WX et al (2012) Environmental evaluation of FRP in UK highway bridge deck replacement applications based on a comparative LCA study. Adv Mat Res 374:43鈥?8
  
• 刊物类别：Earth and Environmental Science
• 刊物主题：Environment
  Environment
  Environmental Economics
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1614-7502

文摘

Purpose Over the last decade, the rehabilitation/renovation of existing buildings has increasingly attracted the attention of scientific community. Many studies focus intensely on the mechanical and energy performance of retrofitted/renovated existing structures, while few works address the environmental impact of such operations. In the present study, the environmental impact of typical retrofit operations, referred to masonry structures, is assessed. In particular, four different structural options are investigated: local replacement of damaged masonry, mortar injection, steel chain installation, and grid-reinforced mortar application. Each different option is analyzed with reference to proper normalized quantities. Thus, the results of this analysis can be used to compute the environmental impact of real large-scale retrofit operations, once the amount/extension of them is defined in the design stage. The final purpose is to give to designers the opportunity to monitor the environmental impact of different retrofit strategies and, once structural requirements are satisfied, identify for each real case the most suitable retrofit option. Methods The environmental impact of the structural retrofit options is assessed by means of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach. A cradle to grave system boundary is considered for each retrofit process. The results of the environmental analysis are presented according to the data format of the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) standard. Indeed, the environmental outcomes are expressed through six impact categories: global warming, ozone depletion, eutrophication, acidification, photochemical oxidation, and nonrenewable energy. Results and discussion For each retrofit option, the interpretation analysis is conducted in order to define which element, material, or process mainly influenced the LCA results. In addition, the results revealed that the recycling of waste materials provides environmental benefits in all the categories of the LCA outcomes. It is also pointed out that a comparison between the four investigated options would be meaningful only once the exact amount of each operation is defined for a specific retrofit case. Conclusions This paper provides a systematic approach and environmental data to drive the selection and identification of structural retrofit options for existing buildings, in terms of sustainability performance. The final aim of this work is also to provide researchers and practitioners, with a better understanding of the sustainability aspects of retrofit operations. In fact, the environmental impacts of the retrofit options here investigated can be used for future research/practical activities, to monitor and control the environmental impact of structural retrofit operations of existing masonry buildings.