Accountability.org: Online Disclosures by U.S. Nonprofits
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Joannie Tremblay-Boire ; Aseem Prakash
  • 关键词:Accountability ; Website disclosures ; Internet ; Transparency
  • 刊名:Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:April 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:26
  • 期:2
  • 页码:693-719
  • 全文大小:502 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Adams, C. A., Hill, W., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour? / British Accounting Review, / 30, 1-1. CrossRef
    2. Amirkhanyan, A. A., Kim, H. J., & Lambright, K. T. (2009). Faith-based assumptions about performance: Does church affiliation matter for service quality and access? / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, / 38, 490-21. CrossRef
    3. Barrett, M. (2001). A stakeholder approach to responsiveness and accountability in non-profit organisations. / Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, / 1(17), 36-1.
    4. Bloodgood, E. A., Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2013). National styles of NGO regulation.? / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.?doi:10.1177/0899764013481111 .
    5. Boris, E. T., & Steuerle, C. E. (2006). Scope and dimensions of the nonprofit sector. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), / The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
    6. Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. / Accounting and Business Research, / 29, 21-1. CrossRef
    7. Brown, L. D., & Moore, M. H. (2001). Accountability, strategy, and international nongovernmental organizations. / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, / 30, 569-87. CrossRef
    8. Burger, R., & Owens, T. (2010). Promoting transparency in the NGO sector. / World Development, / 38, 1263-277. CrossRef
    9. Chaudhri, V., & Wang, J. (2007). Communicating corporate social responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 information technology companies in India. / Management Communication Quarterly, / 21, 232-47. CrossRef
    10. Cho, C. H., & Roberts, R. W. (2010). Environmental reporting on the internet by America’s Toxic 100: Legitimacy and self-presentation. / International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, / 11, 1-6. CrossRef
    11. Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. / Nonprofit Management and Leadership, / 17, 195-09. CrossRef
    12. Cooley, A., & Ron, J. (2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. / International Security, / 27, 5-9. CrossRef
    13. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. / Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, / 14, 429-51.
    14. Dainelli, F., Manetti, G., & Sibilio, B. (2012). Web-based accountability practices in non-profit organizations: The case of national museums. / VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9278-9 .
    15. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. / American Sociological Review, / 48, 147-60. CrossRef
    16. Dol?ak, N., & Houston, K. (2013). Newspaper coverage and climate change legislative activity across US states. / Global Policy.?doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12097 .
    17. Dubnick, M., & Frederickson, H. G. (Eds.). (2011). / Accountable governance. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
    18. Dumont, G. (2013). Nonprofit virtual accountability: An index and its application. / Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, / 42, 1049-067.
    19. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. / World Development, / 31, 813-29.
  • 作者单位:Joannie Tremblay-Boire (1)
    Aseem Prakash (1)

    1. Department of Political Science, University of Washington, 101 Gowen Hall, Box 353530, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
  • 刊物类别:Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
  • 刊物主题:Social Sciences
    Social Sciences
  • 出版者:Springer Netherlands
  • ISSN:1573-7888
文摘
Why do some nonprofits signal their respect for accountability via unilateral website disclosures? We develop an Accountability Index to examine the websites of 200 U.S. nonprofits ranked in the Chronicle of Philanthropy’s 2010 “Philanthropy 400.-Our intuition is that nonprofits recognize that the “nondistributional constraint-by itself may not generate sufficient trust. We expect nonprofits-incentives for website disclosures will be shaped by their organizational and sectoral characteristics. Our analyses suggest that nonprofits appearing frequently in newspapers disclose more accountability information while nonprofits larger in size disclose less. Religion-related nonprofits tend to disclose less information, suggesting that religious bonding enhances trust and reduces incentives for self-disclosure. Nonprofits in the health sector disclose less information, arguably because governmental regulations in which they are embedded reduce marginal benefits from voluntary disclosures. Education nonprofits, on the other hand, tend to disclose more accountability information perhaps because they supply credence goods.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700