A nonlinear relationship between genetic diversity and productivity in a polyphagous seed beetle

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：K. J. Burls (1)
  J. Shapiro (2)
  M. L. Forister (3)
  G. A. Hoelzer (3)
  
• 关键词：Intraspecific genetic diversity ; Niche partitioning ; Insect host preference ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Habitat heterogeneity
• 刊名：Oecologia
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：May 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：175
• 期：1
• 页码：151-161
• 全文大小：431 KB
• 参考文献：1. Agashe D (2009) The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic diversity on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitats. Am Nat 174:255-67 CrossRef
  2. Agashe D, Bolnick DI (2010) Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion. Proc Royal Soc: Biol Sci 277:2915-924 CrossRef
  3. Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321-26 CrossRef
  4. Aguirre JD, Marshall DJ (2012) Genetic diversity increases population productivity in a sessile marine environment. Ecology 93:1134-142 CrossRef
  5. Bassar RD, López-Sepulcre A, Walsh MR, Turcotte MM, Torres-Mejia M, Reznick DR (2010) Briding the gap between ecology and evolution: integrating density regulation and life-history evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1206:17-4 CrossRef
  6. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2011) lme4: Liner mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  7. Benard MF, Maher JM (2011) Consequences of intraspecific niche variation: phenotypic similarity increases competition among recently metamorphosed frogs. Oecologia 166:585-92 CrossRef
  8. Bolnick DI, Svanb?ck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1-8 CrossRef
  9. Carroll SP, Hendry AP, Reznick DN, Fox CW (2007) Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:387-93 CrossRef
  10. Cook-Patton SC, McArt SH, Parachnowitsch AL, Thaler JS, Agrawal AA (2011) A direct comparison of the consequences of plant genotypic and species diversity on communities and ecosystem function. Ecology 92:915-23 CrossRef
  11. Crawford KM, Crutsinger GM, Sanders NJ (2007) Host-plant genotypic diversity mediates the distribution of an ecosystem engineer. Ecology 88:2114-120 CrossRef
  12. Crutsinger GM, Collins MD, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Nice CC, Sanders NJ (2006) Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process. Science 313:966-68 CrossRef
  13. Crutsinger GM, Strauss SY, Rudgers JA (2010) Genetic variation within a dominant shrub species determines plant species colonization in a coastal dune ecosystem. Ecology 91:1237-243 CrossRef
  14. Davis JM, Nufio CR, Papaj DR (2011) Resource quality or competition: why increase resource acceptance in the presence of conspecifics? Behav Ecol 22:730-37 CrossRef
  15. de Witt TJ, Sih A, Wilson DS (1998) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 13:77-1 CrossRef
  16. Donohue K, Polisetty CR, Wender NJ (2005) Genetic basis and consequences of niche construction: plasticity-induced genetic constraints on the evolution of seed dispersal in / Arabidopsis thaliana. Am Nat 165:537-50 CrossRef
  17. Fisher RA (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugenics 7:353-69
  18. Ford EB (1964) Ecological genetics. Chapman and Hall, London
  19. Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Forister ML, Nice CC (2011) A hierarchical Bayesian approach to ecological count data: a flexible tool for ecologists. PLoS One 6:e26785 CrossRef
  20. Forister MF, Scholl CF (2012) Use of an exotic host plant affects mate choice in an insect herbivore. Am Nat 179. doi:10.1086/665648
  21. Forister MF, Ehmer AG, Futuyma DJ (2007) The genetic architecture of a niche: variation and covariation in host use traits in the Colorado potato beetle. J Evol Biol 20:985-96 CrossRef
  22. Forister MF, Gompert Z, Nice CC, Forister GW, Fordyce JA (2011) Ant association facilitates the evolution of diet breadth in a lycaenid butterfly. Proc Royal Soc B 278:1539-547 CrossRef
  23. Forister MF, Scholl CF, Jahner JP, Wilson JS, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Narala D, Buerkle CA, Nice CC (2012a) Specificity, rank preference and the colonization of a non-native host plant by the Melissa blue butterfly. Oecologia. doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2476-8
  24. Forister ML, Dyer LA, Singer MS, Stireman JO III, Lill JT (2012b) Revisiting the evolution of ecological specialization, with emphasis on animal-plant interactions. Ecology 93:981-91 CrossRef
  25. Forsman A, Ahnesj? J, Ceasar S, Karlsson M (2008) A model of ecological and evolutionary consequences of color polymorphism. Ecology 89:34-0 CrossRef
  26. Forsman A, Wennersten L, Karlsson M, Caesar S (2012) Variation in founder groups promotes establishment success in the wild. Proc Royal Soc: Biol Sci 279:2800-806 CrossRef
  27. Fox CW (1993) A quantitative genetic analysis of oviposition preference and larval performance on two hosts in the bruchid beetle, / Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 47:166-75 CrossRef
  28. Fox CW, Reed DH (2011) Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65:246-58 CrossRef
  29. Fox CW, Thaker MS, Mousseau TA (1997) Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am Nat 149:149-63 CrossRef
  30. Fox CW, Sheibly KL, Smith BP, Wallin WG (2007) Inbreeding depression in seed-feeding beetles, / Callosobruchus maculatus and / Stator limbus (Coleoptera: chrysomelidae). Bull Entomol Res 97:49-4 CrossRef
  31. Fridley JD, Grime JP (2010) Community and ecosystem effects of intraspecific genetic diversity in grassland microcosms of varying species diversity. Ecology 91:2272-283 CrossRef
  32. Futuyma DJ, Peterson SC (1985) Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Annu Rev Entomol 30:217-38 CrossRef
  33. Gompert Z, Fordyce JA (2011) bayespref: Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of ecological count data. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN-Rproject.org/package=bayespref
  34. Hairston NG Jr, Ellner SP, Geber MA, Yoshida T, Fox JA (2005) Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol Lett 8:1114-127 CrossRef
  35. Hanski IA (2011) Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:14397-4404 CrossRef
  36. Hanski IA, Singer MC (2001) Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. Am Nat 158:341-53 CrossRef
  37. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346-63 CrossRef
  38. Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609-23 CrossRef
  39. Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449-60 CrossRef
  40. Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243-73 CrossRef
  41. Jousset A, Schmid B, Scheu S, Eisenhauer N (2011) Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 14:537-45 CrossRef
  42. Kotowska AM, Cahill JF Jr, Keddie BA (2010) Plant genetic diversity yields increased plant productivity and herbivore performance. J Ecol 98:237-45 CrossRef
  43. Krasnov BR, Khokhlova IS, Shenbrot GI (2003) Density-dependent host selection in ectoparasites: An application of isodar theory to fleas parasitizing rodents. Oecologia 134:365-72
  44. Kristensen TN, Barker JSF, Pederson KS, Loeschcke V (2008) Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions. Proc Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 275:2055-061 CrossRef
  45. Lind MI, Johansson F (2009) Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity in island populations of the common frog / Rana temporaria under divergent selection pressures. Evolution 63:1508-518 CrossRef
  46. McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228-33 CrossRef
  47. Messina FJ (1990) Alternative life-histories in / Callosobruchus maculatus: Environmental and genetic bases. In: Fujii K, Gatehouse AMR, Johnson CD, Mitchell R, Yoshida T (eds) Bruchids and legumes: economics, ecology, and coevolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
  48. Messina FJ (1991) Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85:447-55 CrossRef
  49. Messina FJ (2004) How labile are the egg-laying preferences of seed beetles? Ecol Entomol 29:318-26 CrossRef
  50. Messina FJ, Karren ME (2003) Adaptation to a novel host modifies hsot discrimination by the seed beetle / Callosobruchus maculatus. Anim Behav 65:501-07 CrossRef
  51. Messina FJ, Slade AF (1997) Inheritance of host-plant choice in the seed beetle / Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:848-55
  52. Messina FJ, Jones JC, Mendenhall M, Muller A (2009) Genetic modification of host acceptance by a seed beetle, / Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 102:181-88 CrossRef
  53. Noguchi K, Hui WLW, Gel YR, Gastwirth JL, Miao W (2009) lawstat: an R package for biostatistics, public policy, and law. R package version 2.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lawstat
  54. Nylin S, Janz N (2009) Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation? Evol Ecol 23:137-46 CrossRef
  55. Pienaar J, Greeff JM (2003) Maternal control of offspring sex and male morphology in the / Otitesella fig wasp. J Evol Biol 16:244-53 CrossRef
  56. Price TD, Qvarnstr?m A, Irwin DE (2003) The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc Royal Soc: Biol Sci 270:1433-440 CrossRef
  57. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/
  58. Relyea RA (2002) Costs of phenotypic plasticity. Am Nat 159:272-82 CrossRef
  59. Roff DA (2007) A centennial celebration for quantitative genetics. Evolution 61:1017-032 CrossRef
  60. Schoener TW (2011) The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331:426-29 CrossRef
  61. Tack AJM, Roslin T (2011) The relative importance of host-plant genetic diversity in structuring the associated herbivore community. Ecology 92:1594-604 CrossRef
  62. Teixeira IR, Barchuk AR, Medeiros L, Zucoloto FS (2009) Females of the weevil / Zabrotes subfasciatus manipulate the size and number of eggs according to the host seed availability. Physiol Entomol 34:246-50 CrossRef
  63. Thompson JN (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol Exp Appl 47:3-4 CrossRef
  64. Tilman D (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:10854-0861 CrossRef
  65. Tilman D, Downing JA (1994) Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363-65 CrossRef
  66. Van Valen L (1965) Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am Nat 99:377-90 CrossRef
  67. Wacker L, Baudois O, Eichenberger-Glinz S, Schmid B (2008) Environmental heterogeneity increases complementarity in experimental grassland communities. Basic Appl Ecol 9:467-74 CrossRef
  68. Wallin KF, Raffa KF (2004) Feedback between individual host selection behavior and population dynamics in an eruptive herbivore. Ecol Monogr 74:101-16 CrossRef
  69. Weltzin JF, Muth NZ, Von Holle B, Cole PG (2003) Genetic diversity and invasibility: a test using a model system with a novel experimental design. Oikos 103:505-18 CrossRef
  70. Wender NJ, Polisetty CR, Donohue K (2005) Density-dependent processes influencing the evolutionary dynamics of dispersal: a functional analysis of seed dispersal in / Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 92:960-71
  71. Wennersten L, Forsman A (2012) Population-level consequences for polymorphism, plasticity, and randomized phenotype switching: a review of predictions. Biol Rev 87:756-67 CrossRef
  72. Wilson MR, Leather SR (2012) The effect of past natural enemy activity on host-plant preference of two aphid species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 144:216-22
  73. Wilkinson A, Solan M, Taylor AFS, Alexander IJ, Johnson D (2010) Intraspecific diversity regulates fungal productivity and respiration. PLoS One 5:e12604 CrossRef
  74. Wise CA, Ranker TA, Linhart YB (2002) Modeling problems in conservation genetics with / Brassica rapa: genetic variation and fitness in plants under mild, stable conditions. Conserv Biol 16:1542-554 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：K. J. Burls (1)
  J. Shapiro (2)
  M. L. Forister (3)
  G. A. Hoelzer (3)
  
  1. Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Program, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA
  2. Bishop Manogue High School, Reno, NV, 89511, USA
  3. Biology Department, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA
  
• ISSN：1432-1939

文摘

There has been a renewed interest in the effects of genetic diversity on population-level and community-level processes. Many of these studies have found non-additive, positive effects of diversity, but these studies have rarely examined ecological mechanisms by which diverse populations increase productivity. We used the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to study genetic diversity in insect host preference and fecundity and its effects on total productivity and resource use. We created genetically distinct lineages that varied in host preference and fecundity and then assembled groups consisting of one, three, five, or all ten lineages. We found that lineages with intermediate diversity had the highest productivity, though resource use did not change in diverse groups. In addition, lineages showed substantial plasticity in host preference when preference was assayed either individually or in groups, and productivity was much lower in groups than predicted by individual assays. These results highlight the interplay of genetic diversity, resource variation, and phenotypic plasticity in determining the ecological consequences of genetic diversity. In addition, when plasticity modifies a population’s response to population density, this may create a complex interaction between genetic diversity and density, influencing selective pressures on the population and potentially maintaining genetic diversity across generations.