参考文献:1.Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R (2002) Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9325):2217–2223PubMed CrossRef 2.Aigmueller T, Umek W, Elenskaia K et al (2013) Guidelines for the management of third and fourth degree perineal tears after vaginal birth from the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Int Urogynecol J 24(4):553–558PubMed CrossRef 3.Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL et al (2011) Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 117(3):627–635PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef 4.Freeman RM (2013) Can we prevent childbirth‐related pelvic floor dysfunction? BJOG 120(2):137–140PubMed CrossRef 5.Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan M, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 35–111 6.Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A et al (2005) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). WHO-ICS International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn. Health Publications Ltd., Paris, pp 255–312 7.Pretlove S, Thompson P, Toozs‐Hobson P, Radley S, Khan K (2008) Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG 115(4):421–434PubMed CrossRef 8.Langer B, Minetti A (2006) Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(1 Suppl):1S59–1S67 9.Murray J, Saxena S, Modi N, Majeed A, Aylin P, Bottle A et al (2013) Quality of routine hospital birth records and the feasibility of their use for creating birth cohorts. J Public Health (Oxf) 35:298–307 10.Gurol‐Urganci I, Cromwell D, Edozien L et al (2013) Third‐and fourth‐degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG 120(12):1516–1525PubMed CrossRef 11.Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G (2014) Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 125(1):6–14PubMed CrossRef 12.Gaspar J, Chagas J, Osanan G, Cruz-Correa R, Reis Z (2013) Maternal and neonatal healthcare information system: development of an obstetric electronic health record and healthcare indicators dashboard. In: Bursa M, Khuri S, Renda ME (eds) Information technology in bio- and medical informatics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 62–76 13.Reis ZS, Lage EM, Aguiar RA, Gaspar Jde S, Vitral GL, Machado EG (2014) Association between risk pregnancy and route of delivery with maternal and neonatal outcomes. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 36(2):65–71PubMed CrossRef 14.World Health Organization (2003) Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and newborn care: a guide for essential practice 15.Thacker SB, Banta HD (1983) Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv 38(6):322–338PubMed CrossRef 16.Carroli G, Mignini L (2009) Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD000081 17.Lede RL, Belizán JM, Carroli G (1996) Is routine use of episiotomy justified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(5):1399–1402PubMed CrossRef 18.Jangö H, Langhoff-Roos J, Rosthøj S, Sakse A (2014) Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(1):59.e1–59.e6CrossRef 19.Räisänen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M et al (2013) Changing associations of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk strata: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004–2011. BMJ Open 3(8):e003216 20.Baghurst PA, Antoniou G (2012) Risk models for benchmarking severe perineal tears during vaginal childbirth: a cross-sectional study of public hospitals in South Australia, 2002-08. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 26(5):430–437PubMed CrossRef 21.Miller ES, Barber EL, McDonald KD, Gossett DR (2014) Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 123(2 Pt 1):248–254PubMed CrossRef 22.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2014) Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 123(3):693–711CrossRef 23.Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2007) Forceps delivery: potential benefits and a call for continued training. J Perinatol 27(6):327–328PubMed CrossRef 24.Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE (2013) Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13:59PubMed PubMedCentral CrossRef 25.Lowder JL, Burrows LJ, Krohn MA, Weber AM (2007) Risk factors for primary and subsequent anal sphincter lacerations: a comparison of cohorts by parity and prior mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(4):344.e1–344.e5CrossRef 26.Ampt AJ, Ford JB, Roberts CL, Morris JM (2013) Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injuries and associated risk factors for vaginal singleton term births in New South Wales 2001-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 53(1):9–16PubMed CrossRef 27.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ (2014) Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(3):179–193CrossRef 28.Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM (2012) Prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi-country study. BJOG 119(3):340–347PubMed CrossRef
作者单位:Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro (1) Gláucia M. Varella Pereira (3) Regina Amélia Pessoa Aguiar (1) Rodrigo Leite Azevedo (4) Mário Dias Correia-Junior (1) (5) Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis (1) (2)
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Alfredo Balena, 190 – 2. andar, Belo Horizonte, 30130-100, Brazil 3. Urogynaecology, City Council Para de Minas, Minas Gerais, Brazil 4. School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil 5. Otto Cirne Maternity, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil 2. Center of Medical Informatics, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
刊物主题:Gynecology; Urology/Andrology;
出版者:Springer London
ISSN:1433-3023
文摘
Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery and its relationship with predisposing clinical and obstetric factors.