Forward and inverse dynamics of nonholonomic mechanical systems

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Domenico Guida (1)
  Carmine M. Pappalardo (1)
  
• 关键词：Mechanical systems ; Forward and inverse dynamics ; Fundamental equations of constrained motion ; Nonholonomic constraints ; Underactuation equivalence principle
• 刊名：Meccanica
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：July 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：49
• 期：7
• 页码：1547-1559
• 全文大小：353 KB
• 参考文献：1. Guida D, Pappalardo CM (2012) A new control algorithm for nonlinear underactuated mechanical systems. Int J Mech Eng Ind Des 1:61-2
  2. Pappalardo CM (2012) Combination of extended Udwadia–Kalaba control algorithm with extended Kalman filter estimation method. Int J Mech Eng Ind Des 1:1-8
  3. Shabana AA (2013) Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
  4. Shabana AA (2010) Computational dynamics. Wiley, New York CrossRef
  5. Moon FC (1992) Applied dynamics. Wiley–Interscience, New York
  6. Moon FC (1992) Chaotic and fractal dynamics: an introduction for applied scientists and engineers. Wiley–Interscience, New York CrossRef
  7. de Jalon JG, Bayo E (2011) Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems: the real-time challenge. Springer, New York
  8. Bauchau OA (2011) Flexible multibody dynamics. Springer, Dordrecht CrossRef
  9. Fantoni I, Lozano R (2002) Non-linear control for underactuated mechanical systems. Springer, Berlin CrossRef
  10. Bloch AM, Baillieul J, Crouch P, Marsden J (2007) Nonholonomic mechanics and control. Springer, Berlin
  11. Goldstein H, Poole CP, Safko JL (2001) Classical mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading
  12. Taylor JR (2005) Classical mechanics. University Science Books, Sausalito
  13. Siciliano B, Sciavicco L, Villani L, Oriolo G (2011) Robotics: modelling, planning and control. Springer, Berlin
  14. Jain A (2011) Robot and multibody dynamics: analysis and algorithms. Springer, New York CrossRef
  15. Pappalardo CM (2012) Dynamics, identification and control of multibody systems. University of Salerno, Salerno
  16. Udwadia FE (2014) A new approach to stable optimal control of complex nonlinear dynamical systems. J Appl Mech 81:031001 CrossRef
  17. Udwadia FE, Schutte AD (2010) Equations of motion for general constrained systems in Lagrangian mechanics. Acta Mech 213:111-29 CrossRef
  18. Meirovitch L (2010) Methods of analytical dynamics. Dover, New York
  19. Udwadia FE, Kalaba RE (1996) Analytical dynamics: a new approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
  20. Lanczos C (1986) The variational principles of mechanics. Dover, New York
  21. Shabana AA (2011) Computational continuum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
  22. Meirovitch L (2010) Fundamentals of vibrations. Waveland, Long Grove
  23. Flannery MR (2005) The enigma of nonholonomic constraints. Am J Phys 73(3):265 CrossRef
  24. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1976) Mechanics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
  25. Flannery MR (2011) The elusive D’Alembert–Lagrange dynamics of nonholonomic systems. Am J Phys 79(9):932 CrossRef
  26. Flannery MR (2011) D’Alembert–Lagrange analytical dynamics for nonholonomic systems. J Math Phys 52(3):1-9
  27. Greiner W (2010) Classical mechanics: systems of particles and Hamiltonian dynamics. Springer, Berlin CrossRef
  28. Udwadia FE, Kalaba RE (1992) A new perspective on constrained motion. Proc R Soc Lond A 439:407-10 CrossRef
  29. Hertz H (2012) The principles of mechanics: presented in a new form. Cosimo Classics, New York
  30. Udwadia FE, Kalaba RE (1993) On motion. J Frankl Inst 330:571-77 CrossRef
  31. Udwadia FE, Kalaba RE (2002) On the foundations of analytical dynamics. Int J Nonlinear Mech 37:1079-090 CrossRef
  32. Udwadia FE, Phohomsiri P (2006) Explicit equations of motion for constrained mechanical systems with singular mass matrices and applications to multi-body dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond A 462:2097-117 CrossRef
  33. Udwadia FE, Kalaba RE, De Falco D (2009) Dinamica Analitica. Un Nuovo Approccio, Edises
  34. Cheli F, Pennestri E (2006) Cinematica e Dinamica dei Sistemi Multibody, vol 1. Casa Editrice Ambrosiana, Milano
  35. Pennestri E, De Falco D, Vita L (2009) An investigation of the influence of the pseudoinverse matrix calculations on multibody dynamics simulations by means of the Udwadia–Kalaba formulation. J Aerosp Eng 22:365-72 CrossRef
  36. Udwadia FE, Wanichanon T (2010) Hamel’s paradox and the foundations of analytical dynamics. Appl Math Comput 217:1253-263 CrossRef
  37. Udwadia FE (2005) Equations of motion for constrained multibody systems and their control. J Optim Theory Appl 127(3):627-38 CrossRef
  38. Udwadia FE (2008) Optimal tracking control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc R Soc Lond A 464:2341-363 CrossRef
  39. Slotine JJ, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  40. Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
  41. Strang G (2005) Linear algebra and its applications. Cengage Learning, Stamford
  42. Kane TR, Levinson DA (1985) Dynamics: theory and applications. McGraw-Hill College, New York
  
• 作者单位：Domenico Guida (1)
  Carmine M. Pappalardo (1)
  
  1. Department of Industrial Engineering (DIIN), University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084, Fisciano, Italy
  
• ISSN：1572-9648

文摘

This paper deals with the forward and the inverse dynamic problems of mechanical systems subjected to nonholonomic constraints. The intrinsically dual nature of these two problems is identified and utilised to develop a systematic approach to formulate and solve them according to an unified framework. The proposed methodology is based on the fundamental equations of constrained motion which derive from Gauss’s principle of least constraint. The main advantage arising from using the fundamental equations of constrained motion is that they represent an effective method capable to derive the generalised acceleration of a mechanical system, constrained in general by a set of nonholonomic constraints, together with the generalized constraint forces (forward dynamics). When the constraint equations are used to represent the desired behaviour of the mechanical system under study, the generalised constraint forces deriving from the fundamental equations of constrained motion provide the control actions which reproduce the specified motion for the system (inverse dynamics). This approach is systematically extended to underactuated mechanical systems introducing a new method named underactuation equivalence principle. The underactuation equivalence principle is founded on the key idea that the underactuation property of a mechanical system can be mathematically represented using a particular set of nonholonomic constraint equations. Two simple case-studies are reported to exemplify the proposed methodology. In the first case-study the computation of the generalised constraint forces relative to the revolute joint constraints of a physical pendulum is illustrated. In the second case-study the calculation of the control action which solves the swing-up problem for an inverted pendulum is described.