In vitro evaluation of anti-infective activity of a Lactobacillus plantarum strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Jugal Kishore Das (1)
Debasmita Mishra (1)
Pratikshya Ray (1)
Prangya Tripathy (1)
Tushar K Beuria (2)
Neera Singh (1)
Mrutyunjay Suar (1) - 关键词：Probiotic ; Lactobacillus ; Salmonella ; HCT ; 116 ; Cell free culture supernatant
- 刊名：Gut Pathogens
- 出版年：2013
- 出版时间：December 2013
- 年：2013
- 卷：5
- 期：1
- 全文大小：662KB
- 参考文献：1. Graham SM, Walsh AL, Molyneux EM, Phiri AJ, Molyneux ME: Clinical presentation of non-typhoidal Salmonella bacteraemia in Malawian children . / Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000,94(3):310鈥?14. CrossRef
2. Hammad AM, Shimamoto T: Towards a compatible probiotic-antibiotic combination therapy: assessment of antimicrobial resistance in the Japanese probiotics. / J Appl Microbiol 2010,109(4):1349鈥?360. CrossRef
3. Bhan MK, Bahl R, Bhatnagar S: Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. / Lancet 2005,366(9487):749鈥?62. CrossRef
4. Birosova L, Mikulasova M: Development of triclosan and antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. / J Med Microbiol 2009,58(Pt 4):436鈥?41. CrossRef
5. Alcaine SD, Warnick LD, Wiedmann M: Antimicrobial resistance in nontyphoidal Salmonella . / J Food Prot 2007,70(3):780鈥?90.
6. Truusalu K, Mikelsaar RH, Naaber P, Karki T, Kullisaar T, Zilmer M, Mikelsaar M: Eradication of Salmonella Typhimurium infection in a murine model of typhoid fever with the combination of probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3 and ofloxacin. / BMC Microbiol 2008, 8:132. CrossRef
7. Gibson GR, McCartney AL, Rastall RA: Prebiotics and resistance to gastrointestinal infections. / Br J Nutr 2005,93(Suppl 1):S31鈥?4. CrossRef
8. Roselli M, Finamore A, Britti MS, Mengheri E: Probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis MB5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protect intestinal Caco-2 cells from the inflammation-associated response induced by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. / Br J Nutr 2006,95(6):1177鈥?184. CrossRef
9. Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK: Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. / Clin Microbiol Rev 2003,16(4):658鈥?72. CrossRef
10. Collado MC, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Sanz Y: The impact of probiotic on gut health. / Curr Drug Metab 2009,10(1):68鈥?8. CrossRef
11. Rishi P, Mavi SK, Bharrhan S, Shukla G, Tewari R: Protective efficacy of probiotic alone or in conjunction with a prebiotic in Salmonella-induced liver damage. / FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2009,69(2):222鈥?30. CrossRef
12. Macpherson AJ, Harris NL: Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. / Nat Rev Immunol 2004,4(6):478鈥?85. CrossRef
13. Frick JS, Schenk K, Quitadamo M, Kahl F, Koberle M, Bohn E, Aepfelbacher M, Autenrieth IB: Lactobacillus fermentum attenuates the proinflammatory effect of Yersinia enterocolitica on human epithelial cells. / Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007,13(1):83鈥?0. CrossRef
14. Jacobsen CN, Rosenfeldt Nielsen V, Hayford AE, Moller PL, Michaelsen KF, Paerregaard A, Sandstrom B, Tvede M, Jakobsen M: Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. / Appl Environ Microbiol 1999,65(11):4949鈥?956.
15. Timmerman HM, Koning CJ, Mulder L, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC: Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics鈥揂 comparison of functionality and efficacy. / Int J Food Microbiol 2004,96(3):219鈥?33. CrossRef
16. Bayoumi MA, Griffiths MW: Probiotics down-regulate genes in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium pathogenicity islands 1 and 2. / J Food Prot 2010,73(3):452鈥?60.
17. Fayol-Messaoudi D, Berger CN, Coconnier-Polter MH, Lievin-Le Moal V, Servin AL: pH-, Lactic acid-, and non-lactic acid-dependent activities of probiotic Lactobacilli against Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. / Appl Environ Microbiol 2005,71(10):6008鈥?013. CrossRef
18. Meyer AL, Elmadfa I, Herbacek I, Micksche M: Probiotic, as well as conventional yogurt, can enhance the stimulated production of proinflammatory cytokines. / J Hum Nutr Diet 2007,20(6):590鈥?98. CrossRef
19. Moorthy G, Murali MR, Devaraj SN: Protective role of lactobacilli in Shigella dysenteriae 1-induced diarrhea in rats. / Nutrition 2007,23(5):424鈥?33. CrossRef
20. Tejero-Sarinena S, Barlow J, Costabile A, Gibson GR, Rowland I: In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: Evidence for the effects of organic acids. / Anaerobe 2012,18(5):530鈥?38. CrossRef
21. Botes M, Loos B, van Reenen CA, Dicks LM: Adhesion of the probiotic strains Enterococcus mundtii ST4SA and Lactobacillus plantarum 423 to Caco-2 cells under conditions simulating the intestinal tract, and in the presence of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory medicaments. / Arch Microbiol 2008,190(5):573鈥?84. CrossRef
22. Gopal PK, Prasad J, Smart J, Gill HS: In vitro adherence properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20 and Bifidobacterium lactis DR10 strains and their antagonistic activity against an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. / Int J Food Microbiol 2001,67(3):207鈥?16. CrossRef
23. Servin AL, Coconnier MH: Adhesion of probiotic strains to the intestinal mucosa and interaction with pathogens. / Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2003,17(5):741鈥?54. CrossRef
24. Banerjee P, Merkel GJ, Bhunia AK: Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus B-30892 can inhibit cytotoxic effects and adhesion of pathogenic Clostridium difficile to Caco-2 cells. / Gut Pathog 2009,1(1):8. CrossRef
25. Servin AL: Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. / FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004,28(4):405鈥?40. CrossRef
26. Soderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL: Probiotic lactobacilli interfere with Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in vitro . / Curr Microbiol 2011,62(2):618鈥?22. CrossRef
27. Harith JF, Al- M, Saher Daher Abed H: Inhibitory Effect of Lactobacilli isolate on klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm. / Iraqi Academic Scientific Journals 2012,11(2):168鈥?79.
28. Maldonado NC, Silva De R: A simple technique to detect klebsiella biofilm forming strains. Inhibitory potential of Lactobacillus Fermentum CRL 1058 whole cells and products. / Communicating current research and educational topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology 2007, 52鈥?9.
29. Weinstein DL, ONeill BL, Hone DM, Metcalf ES: Differential early interactions between Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and two other pathogenic Salmonella serovars with intestinal epithelial cells. / Infect Immun 1998,66(5):2310鈥?318.
30. Thirabunyanon M, Thongwittaya N: Protection activity of a novel probiotic strain of Bacillus subtilis against Salmonella Enteritidis infection. / Res Vet Sci 2012,93(1):74鈥?1. CrossRef
31. Wallis TS, Galyov EE: Molecular basis of Salmonella -induced enteritis. / Mol Microbiol 2000,36(5):997鈥?005. CrossRef
32. Boyen F, Pasmans F, Van Immerseel F, Morgan E, Adriaensen C, Hernalsteens JP, Decostere A, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F: Salmonella Typhimurium SPI1 genes promote intestinal but not tonsillar colonization in pigs. / Microbes Infect 2006,8(14鈥?5):2899鈥?907. CrossRef
33. De Keersmaecker SC, Marchal K, Verhoeven TL, Engelen K, Vanderleyden J, Detweiler CS: Microarray analysis and motif detection reveal new targets of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium HilA regulatory protein, including hilA itself. / J Bacteriol 2005,187(13):4381鈥?391. CrossRef
34. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. / Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000,97(12):6640鈥?645. CrossRef
35. Altier C: Genetic and environmental control of Salmonella invasion. / J Microbiol 2005, 43:85鈥?2.
36. Vishwakarma V, Periaswamy B, Bhusan Pati N, Slack E, Hardt WD, Suar M: A novel phage element of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis P125109 contributes to accelerated type III secretion system 2-dependent early inflammation kinetics in a mouse colitis model. / Infect Immun 2012,80(9):3236鈥?6. CrossRef
37. Marathe SA, Ray S, Chakravortty D: Curcumin Increases the pathogenicity of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in murine model. / Plos One 2010,5(7):e11511. CrossRef - 作者单位：Jugal Kishore Das (1)
Debasmita Mishra (1)
Pratikshya Ray (1)
Prangya Tripathy (1)
Tushar K Beuria (2)
Neera Singh (1)
Mrutyunjay Suar (1)
1. School of Biotechnology, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, 751024, India
2. Institute of Life Sciences (ILS), Bhubaneswar, 751024, India - ISSN：1757-4749
文摘
Background Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infections are known to exhibit worldwide prevalence with increased morbidity and mortality. The conventional strategies like antibiotic therapy and vaccination have not only proved to be of sub-optimal efficacy but also led to the development of multidrug resistant strains of Salmonella. Antimicrobial activities of probiotics against various enteropathogens and other health promoting effects have assumed greater significance in recent years. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a Lactobacillus plantarum strain (KSBT 56, isolated from a traditional food product of India), in preventing Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis growth and pathogenicity in vitro. Methods and results The cell free culture supernatant (CFCS) of KSBT 56 strain notably inhibited the growth of Salmonella Enteritidis without affecting the growth of other gram-positive lactic acid bacteria. The isolated KSBT 56 strain produces lactic acid similar to other standard probiotic strains like Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 1407. The free radical production by KSBT 56 strain was studied by using sodC mutant of S. Enteritidis, which exhibited reduced growth in the presence of CFCS of the KSBT 56 strain, indicating the inhibitory activity of free radicals on the growth of S. Enteritidis. Our results also showed a significant reduction in the biofilm forming ability of Salmonella Enteritidis in the presence of the KSBT 56 strain (2 log cfu/ml, p = 0.01). Further, the anti-infective characteristics of KSBT 56 strain was validated by gentamicin protection assay which revealed 80% reduction in the invasion of Salmonella Enteritidis to HCT-116 cell line (Salmonella Enteritidis and KSBT 56 in a 1:1 ratio) and delayed addition of Salmonella Enteritidis by 1 h. Similarly, the reduced adhesion of Salmonella to the HCT-116 cells was observed along with the down regulation of hilA gene of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) indicating that they might have acted synergistically to decrease the invasion of the pathogen into the cell line. Conclusions KSBT 56 strain effectively inhibited the growth, invasion and the biofilm forming ability of Salmonella Enteritidis without inhibiting the growth of other Lactobacillus strains. Overall, our result suggested that KSBT 56 can be used as a potential probiotic strain with considerable beneficial effects on the host.