Participant experiences of mindfulness-based childbirth education: a qualitative study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Colleen Fisher (1)
  Yvonne Hauck (2)
  Sara Bayes (3) (4)
  Jean Byrne (5)
  
• 关键词：Childbirth ; Antenatal education ; Mindfulness ; Childbirth satisfaction ; Qualitative
• 刊名：BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：December 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：12
• 期：1
• 全文大小：199KB
• 参考文献：1. Gibbins J, Thomson AM: Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. / Midwifery 2001, 17:302-13. CrossRef
  2. Fisher C, Fenwick J, Hauck Y: How social context impacts on women fears of childbirth: a Western Australian example. / Soc Sci Med 2006, 63:64-5. CrossRef
  3. Brown S, Lumley J: Satisfaction with care in labor and birth: a survey of 790 Australian women. / Birth 1994, 21:4-3. CrossRef
  4. Green JM, Baston HA: Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. / Birth 2003, 30:235-47. CrossRef
  5. Hodnett ED: Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. / Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002,186(Supp)):160-72.
  6. Slade P, MacPherson SA, Hume A, Maresh M: Expectations, experiences and satisfaction with labour. / Brit J Clin Psychol 1993, 32:469-83. CrossRef
  7. Waldenstr?m U: Experience of labour and birth in 1,111 women. / J Psychosom Res 1999, 47:471-82. CrossRef
  8. Waldenstr?m U, Borg IM, Olsson B, Skold M, Wall S: The childbirth experience: a study of 295 new mothers. / Birth 1996, 23:144-53. CrossRef
  9. Dannenbring D, Stevens MJ, House AE: Predictors of childbirth pain and maternal satisfaction. / J Behav Med 1997, 20:127-42. CrossRef
  10. Simkin P: Just another day in a woman’s life? Part II: nature and consistency of women’s long-term memories after their first birth experiences. / Birth 1992, 19:64-1. CrossRef
  11. Creedy D, Shocet I, Horsfall J: Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors. / Birth 2000, 27:104-11. CrossRef
  12. Savage JS: The lived experience of knowing in childbirth. / J Perinat Ed 2006, 15:10-4. CrossRef
  13. Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir IS: Journeying through labour and delivery: perceptions of women who have given birth. / Midwifery 1996, 12:48-1. CrossRef
  14. Hallgren A, Kihlgren M, Norberg A, Forslin L: Women’s perceptions of childbirth and childbirth education before and after education and birth. / Midwifery 1995, 11:130-37. CrossRef
  15. Willcox A, Kobayashi L, Murray I: Twenty-five years of obstetric patient satisfaction in North America: A review of the literature. / J Perinat Neonat Nur 1995, 10:36-7.
  16. Fabian HM, R?destad IJ, Waldenstr?m U: Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women’s opinion and possible outcomes. / Acta Obstet Gyn Scan 2005, 84:436-43.
  17. van den Bergh BRH, Mulder EJF, Mennes M, Glover V: Antenatal maternal anxiety and stress and the neurobehavioural development of the fetus and child: links and possible mechanisms. / A review. Neuorsci Biobehav R 2005, 29:237-58. CrossRef
  18. Talge NM, Neal C, Glover V: Antenatal maternal stress and long-term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why? / J Child Pschol Psyc 2007, 48:225-34.
  19. Huizink AC, de Medina PG R, Mulder EJH, Visser GHA, Buitelaar JK: Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy. / J Child Pschol Psyc 2003, 44:810-18. CrossRef
  20. Renkert S, Nutbeam D: Opportunities to improve maternal health literacy through antenatal education: an exploratory study. / Health Promot Int 2001, 16:381-88. CrossRef
  21. Baer RA: Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. / Clin Psycho-Sci Pr 2003, 10:125-43. CrossRef
  22. Duncan LG, Bardacke N: Mindfulness-based childbirth education and parenting education: promoting family mindfulness during the perinatal period. / J Child Fam Stud 2009, 19:190-02. CrossRef
  23. Merriam SB: / Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1998.
  24. Glaser BG, Strauss AL: / The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Researchers. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
  25. Glaser BG: / Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1978.
  26. Lincoln YS, Guba EG: / Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage publications; 1985.
  27. Johnson MP: An exploration of men’s experience and role at childbirth. / J Men Stud 2002, 10:165-76. CrossRef
  28. Antle-May K, Perrin SP: Prelude, pregnancy and birth. In / Dimensions of Fatherhood. Edited by: Hanson SMH, Bozett FW. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985:64-1.
  29. Chapman L: Searching: expectant fathers-roles during labour and birth. / J Perinat Neonat Nur 1991, 4:21-9.
  30. Chapman L: Expectant fathers-roles during labour and birth. / JOGNN 1992, 21:114-20. CrossRef
  31. Howarth A, Sain N, Treharne GJ: First-time New Zealand mothers-experience of birth: importance of relationship and support. / NZ College of Mid J 2011, 45:6-1.
  32. Nichols M: Parental perspectives of the childbirth experience. / MCN 1995, 21:99-07.
  33. Tighe SM: An exploration of the attitudes of attenders and non-attenders towards antenatal education. / Midwifery 2010, 26:294-03. CrossRef
  34. Deave T, Johnson D: The transition to parenthood: what does it mean for fathers? / J Adv Nur 2008, 63:626-33. CrossRef
  35. Beardshaw T: Supporting the role of fathers around the time of birth. / MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2001, 11:476-79.
  36. Friedewald M, Fletcher R, Fairbairn H: All-male discussion forums for expectant fathers: evaluation of a model. / J Perinat Ed 2005, 14:8-8. CrossRef
  37. Doering SG, Entwisle DR, Quinlan D: Modeling the quality of women’s birth experiences. / J Health Soc Behav 1980, 21:12-1. CrossRef
  38. Kabakian-Khasholian T, Campbell O, Shediac-Rizkallah M, Ghorayeb F: Women’s experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity? / Soc Sci Med 2000, 51:103-13. CrossRef
  39. Walsh D, Devane D: A metasynthesis of midwife-led care. / Qual Health Res 2012, 22:897-10. CrossRef
  40. Namey E, Lyerly A: The meaning of “control-for childbearing women in the US. / Soc Sci Med 2010, 71:769-76. CrossRef
  41. Snowden Ac Martin C, Jomeen J, Martin CH: Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth. / BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:40. CrossRef
  42. Snowden A, Martin C, Jomeem J, Hollins Martin C: Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth. / BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011, 11:40-0. CrossRef
  43. Svensson J, Barclay L, Cooke M: Effective antenatal education: Strategies recommended by expectant and new parents. / J Perinat Ed 2008, 17:33-2. CrossRef
  44. Svensson J, Barclay L, Cooke M: Randomised-controlled trial of two antenatal education programmes. / Midwifery 2009, 25:114-25. CrossRef
  45. Nolan ML: Information giving and education in pregnancy: a review of qualitative studies. / J Pernat Ed 2009, 28:21-0. CrossRef
  46. Christiaens W, Bracke P: Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. / BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007, 7:26. CrossRef
  47. Lee J, Schmied V: Involving men in antenatal education. / BJM 2001, 9:559-61.
  48. Premberg A, Carlsson G, Hellstr?m A-L, Berg M: First time fathers-experiences of childbirth -A phenomenological study. / Midwifery 2011, 27:848-53. CrossRef
  49. Rising SS: Centering pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment. / J Nurse Midwifery 1998, 43:46-4. CrossRef
  50. McNeil DA, Veckved M, Dolan SM, Siever J, Horn S, Tough SC: Getting more than they realized they needed: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of group prenatal care. / BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012, 12:17. CrossRef
  51. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/12/126/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Colleen Fisher (1)
  Yvonne Hauck (2)
  Sara Bayes (3) (4)
  Jean Byrne (5)
  
  1. School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
  2. Curtin University and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Perth, Australia
  3. Research Implementation Fellow, Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire, University of Nottingham, England, UK
  4. Adjunct Midwifery Research Fellow, Curtin University, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Perth, Australia
  5. Honorary Research Fellow, Curtin University, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Perth, Australia
  

文摘

Background Childbirth is an important transitional life event, but one in which many women are dissatisfied stemming in part from a sense that labour is something that happens to them rather than with them. Promoting maternal satisfaction with childbirth means equipping women with communication and decision making skills that will enhance their ability to feel involved in their labour. Additionally, traditional antenatal education does not necessarily prepare expectant mothers and their birth support partner adequately for birth. Mindfulness-based interventions appear to hold promise in addressing these issues. Mindfulness-based Child Birth Education (MBCE) was a pilot intervention combining skills-based antenatal education and Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction. Participant experiences of MBCE, both of expectant mothers and their birth support partners are the focus of this article. Methods A generic qualitative approach was utilised for this study. Pregnant women between 18 and 28 weeks gestation, over 18 years of age, nulliparous with singleton pregnancies and not taking medication for a diagnosed mental illness or taking illicit drugs were eligible to undertake the MBCE program which was run in a metropolitan city in Australia. Focus groups with 12 mothers and seven birth support partners were undertaken approximately four months after the completion of MBCE. Audio recordings of the groups were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the method of constant comparison by all four authors independently and consensus on analysis and interpretation arrived at through team meetings. Results A sense of both ‘empowerment-and ‘community-were the essences of the experiences of MBCE both for mothers and their birth support partner and permeated the themes of ‘awakening my existing potential-and ‘being in a community of like-minded parents- Participants suggested that mindfulness techniques learned during MBCE facilitated their sense of control during birth, and the content and pedagogical approach of MBCE enabled them to be involved in decision making during the birth. The pedagogical approach also fostered a sense of community among participants which extended into the postnatal period. Conclusions MBCE has the potential to empower women to become active participants in the birthing process, thus addressing common concerns regarding lack of control and satisfaction with labour and facilitate peer support into the postnatal period. Further education of health professionals may be needed to ensure that they respond positively to those women and birth support partners who remain active in decision making during birth.