How chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perform in a modified emotional Stroop task
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Matthias Allritz ; Josep Call ; Peter Borkenau
- 关键词：Chimpanzee ; Emotional Stroop ; Great apes ; Attentional bias ; Cognitive bias
- 刊名：Animal Cognition
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：May 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：19
- 期：3
- 页码：435-449
- 全文大小：1,113 KB
- 参考文献：Algom D, Chajut E, Lev S (2004) A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. J Exp Psychol Gen 133:323–338. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323 CrossRef PubMed
Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH (2007) Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull 133:1–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1 CrossRef PubMed
Bateson M, Nettle D (2015) Development of a cognitive bias methodology for measuring low mood in chimpanzees. PeerJ 3:e998. doi:10.7717/peerj.998 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Ben-Haim MS, Mama Y, Icht M, Algom D (2014) Is the emotional Stroop task a special case of mood induction? Evidence from sustained effects of attention under emotion. Atten Percept Psychophys 76:81–97. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0545-7 CrossRef PubMed
Bethell EJ (2015) A “how-to” guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 18(sup1):18–42. doi:10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833 CrossRef
Bethell EJ, Holmes A, Maclarnon A, Semple S (2012) Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques. Anim Welf 21:185–195. doi:10.7120/09627286.21.2.185 CrossRef
Bovet D, Vauclair J (2000) Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behav Brain Res 109:143–165. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00146-7 CrossRef PubMed
Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Conspecific recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardiac responses to significant others. J Comp Psychol 103:215–220. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.103.3.215 CrossRef PubMed
Buckley TC, Blanchard EB, Neill WT (2000) Information processing and PTSD: a review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev 20:1041–1065. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00030-6 CrossRef PubMed
Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Constantine R, McNally RJ, Hornig CD (2001) Snake fear and the pictorial emotional Stroop paradigm. Cognit Ther Res 25:757–764. doi:10.1023/A:1012923507617 CrossRef
De Ruiter C, Brosschot JF (1994) The emotional Stroop interference effect in anxiety: attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behav Res Ther 32:315–319. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90128-7 CrossRef PubMed
Fagot J, Martin-Malivel J, Dépy D (2000) What is the evidence for an equivalence between objects and pictures in birds and nonhuman primates. In: Fagot J (ed) Picture perception in animals. Psychology Press, New York, pp 295–320
Field M, Cox WM (2008) Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depen 97:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030 CrossRef
Fox E, Griggs L, Mouchlianitis E (2007) The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Emotion 7:691–696. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.691 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Frings C, Englert J, Wentura D, Bermeitinger C (2010) Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect. Q J Exp Psychol 63:42–49. doi:10.1080/17470210903156594 CrossRef
Hirata S et al (2013) Brain response to affective pictures in the chimpanzee. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep01342
Kano F, Tanaka M, Tomonaga M (2008) Enhanced recognition of emotional stimuli in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 11:517–524. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0142-7 CrossRef PubMed
Kindt M, Brosschot JF (1997) Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli. J Abnorm Psychol 106:644–648. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.106.4.644 CrossRef PubMed
King JE, Figueredo AJ (1997) The five-factor model plus dominance in chimpanzee personality. J Res Pers 31:257–271. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2179 CrossRef
King HM, Kurdziel LB, Meyer JS, Lacreuse A (2012) Effects of testosterone on attention and memory for emotional stimuli in male rhesus monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrino 37:396–409. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.010 CrossRef
Koda H, Sato A, Kato A (2013) Is attentional prioritisation of infant faces unique in humans?: comparative demonstrations by modified dot-probe task in monkeys. Behav Process 98:31–36. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.013 CrossRef
Koster EH, Crombez G, Van Damme S, Verschuere B, De Houwer J (2004) Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion 4:312–317. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.312 CrossRef PubMed
Lacreuse A, Schatz K, Strazzullo S, King HM, Ready R (2013) Attentional biases and memory for emotional stimuli in men and male rhesus monkeys. Anim Cogn 16:861–871. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0618-y CrossRef PubMed
Lang PJ, Davis M, Öhman A (2000) Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. J Affect Disord 61:137–159. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00343-8 CrossRef PubMed
Lavy E, Van den Hout M (1993) Selective attention evidenced by pictorial and linguistic Stroop tasks. Behav Ther 24:645–657. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80323-5 CrossRef
Mackay DG, Shafto M, Taylor JK, Marian DE, Abrams L, Dyer JR (2004) Relations between emotion, memory, and attention: evidence from taboo Stroop, lexical decision, and immediate memory tasks. Mem Cogn 32:474–488. doi:10.3758/BF03195840 CrossRef
MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P (1986) Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 95:15–20. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.95.1.15 CrossRef PubMed
Marzouki Y, Gullstrand J, Goujon A, Fagot J (2014) Baboons’ response speed is biased by their mood. PLoS ONE 9(7):e102562. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102562 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Mathews A, MacLeod C (1985) Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behav Res Ther 23:563–569. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90104-4 CrossRef PubMed
Mauer N, Borkenau P (2007) Temperament and early information processing: temperament-related attentional bias in emotional Stroop tasks. Pers Indiv Differ 43:1063–1073. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.025 CrossRef
McKenna FP, Sharma D (2004) Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components. J Exp Psychol Learn 30:382–392. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382 CrossRef
Mogg K, Bradley BP (2003) Selective processing of nonverbal information in anxiety: attentional biases for threat. In: Philippot P, Feldman RS, Coats EJ (eds) Nonverbal behavior in clinical settings. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 127–143CrossRef
Öhman A, Mineka S (2001) Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol Rev 108:483–522. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483 CrossRef PubMed
Parr LA (2001) Cognitive and physiological markers of emotional awareness in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 4:223–229. doi:10.1007/s100710100085 CrossRef PubMed
Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M (2005) Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:469–491. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002 CrossRef PubMed
Phaf RH, Kan K-J (2007) The automaticity of emotional Stroop: a meta-analysis. J Behav Ther Exp Psy 38:184–199. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.008 CrossRef
Pomerantz O, Terkel J, Suomi SJ, Paukner A (2012) Stereotypic head twirls, but not pacing, are related to a ‘pessimistic’-like judgment bias among captive tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 15:689–698. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0497-7 CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral
Pratto F, John OP (1991) Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. J Pers Soc Psychol 61:380–391. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380 CrossRef PubMed
Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN (2004) The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3:243–260. doi:10.1177/1534582305275423 CrossRef PubMed
Schmidt LJ, Belopolsky AV, Theeuwes J (2014) Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cogn Emot. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.924484 PubMed
Shibasaki M, Kawai N (2009) Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): an evolutionarily predisposed visual system. J Comp Psychol 123:131–135. doi:10.1037/a0015095 CrossRef PubMed
Shibasaki M, Isomura T, Masataka N (2014) Viewing images of snakes accelerates making judgements of their colour in humans: red snake effect as an instance of ‘emotional Stroop facilitation’. R Soc Open Sci. doi:10.1098/rsos.140066 PubMed PubMedCentral
Siegrist M (1995) Effects of taboo words on color-naming performance on a Stroop test. Percept Motor Skill 81:1119–1122. doi:10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1119 CrossRef
Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Waters AJ, Sayette MA, Wertz JM (2003) Carry-over effects can modulate emotional Stroop effects. Cogn Emot 17:501–509. doi:10.1080/02699930143000716 CrossRef
Weiss A et al (2009) Assessing chimpanzee personality and subjective well-being in Japan. Am J Primatol 71:283–292. doi:10.1002/ajp.20649 CrossRef PubMed
Williams JMG, Mathews A, MacLeod C (1996) The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull 120:3–24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3 CrossRef PubMed
Witthöft M, Rist F, Bailer J (2008) Enhanced early emotional intrusion effects and proportional habituation of threat response for symptom and illness words in college students with elevated health anxiety. Cogn Ther Res 32:818–842. doi:10.1007/s10608-007-9159-5 CrossRef
Yiend J (2010) The effects of emotion on attention: a review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cogn Emot 24:3–47. doi:10.1080/02699930903205698 CrossRef
Yiend J, Barnicot K, Koster EH (2013) Attention and emotion. In: Robinson MD, Watkins ER, Harmon-Jones E (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion. Guilford Press, New York, pp 97–116 - 作者单位：Matthias Allritz (1) (2)
Josep Call (2) (3)
Peter Borkenau (1)
1. Department for Differential Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
2. Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
3. School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK - 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
- 刊物主题：Life Sciences
Behavioural Sciences
Zoology
Human Physiology - 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
- ISSN：1435-9456
文摘
The emotional Stroop task is an experimental paradigm developed to study the relationship between emotion and cognition. Human participants required to identify the color of words typically respond more slowly to negative than to neutral words (emotional Stroop effect). Here we investigated whether chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) would show a comparable effect. Using a touch screen, eight chimpanzees were trained to choose between two simultaneously presented stimuli based on color (two identical images with differently colored frames). In Experiment 1, the images within the color frames were shapes that were either of the same color as the surrounding frame or of the alternative color. Subjects made fewer errors and responded faster when shapes were of the same color as the frame surrounding them than when they were not, evidencing that embedded images affected target selection. Experiment 2, a modified version of the emotional Stroop task, presented subjects with four different categories of novel images: three categories of pictures of humans (veterinarian, caretaker, and stranger), and control stimuli showing a white square. Because visits by the veterinarian that include anaesthetization can be stressful for subjects, we expected impaired performance in trials presenting images of the veterinarian. For the first session, we found correct responses to be indeed slower in trials of this category. This effect was more pronounced for subjects whose last anaesthetization experience was more recent, indicating that emotional valence caused the slowdown. We propose our modified emotional Stroop task as a simple method to explore which emotional stimuli affect cognitive performance in nonhuman primates.