刊名:Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance
出版年:2015
出版时间:February 2015
年:2015
卷:24
期:2
页码:909-919
全文大小:430 KB
参考文献:1. B.T. Timofeev, G.P. Karzov, A.A. Blumin, and V.I. Smirnov, Determination of crack arrest toughness for Russian light water reactor pressure vessel materials. / Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 77, 519-29 (2000) 2. R.H. Bryan, B.R. Bass, and J.G. Merkle, The heavy-section steel technology pressurized-thermal-shock experiment, PTSE-1. / Eng. Fract. Mech. 23(1), 81-7 (1986) CrossRef 3. ASTM E1221-06, 2006, “Standard Test Method for Determining Plane-Strain Crack Arrest Fracture Toughness, / K 1a, of Ferritic Steels,- / Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 4. M.A. Sokolov, J.G. Merkle, Pendulum Impact Testing: A Century of Progress, / ASTM STP 1380, T.A. Siewert and M.P. Manahan, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, p 382-93 5. T. Planman, K. Wallin, and R. Rintamaa, / 14th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SmiRT 14), Lyon, France, Aug. 17-2, 1997, International Association for Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, Germany, p 415-22 6. K. Wallin, Report No. VTT-MET B 221, Metals Laboratory, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland, January 1993 7. J. Ahlf, D. Bellmann, J. Fohl, H. Hebenbrock, F.J. Schmitt, and W. Spalthoff, Radiation Embrittlement of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels: An International Review, / ASTM STP 909, Vol. 2, L.E. Steels, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1986, p 34-1 8. A. Fabry, Small Specimen Test Techniques, / ASTM STP 1329, W.R. Corwin, S.T. Rosinski, and E. Van Walle, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1998, p 274-97 9. S.K. Iskander, R.K. Nanstad, M.A. Sokolov, D.E. Mccabe, J.T. Hutton, and D.L. Thomas, Effects of Radiation on Materials: 18th International Symposium, / ASTM STP 1325, R.K. Nanstad, M.L. Hamilton, F.A. Garner, and A.S. Kumar, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1999, p 204-22 10. S. Sathyanarayanan, A. Moitra, G. Sasikala, A. Dasgupta, S. Saroja, A.K. Bhaduri, Baldev Raj, and Vakil Singh, Characterization of crack arrest phenomena in a modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. J. Test. Eval. 39(3), 448-55 (2011) 11. H.A. Ernst, P.C. Paris, and J.D. Landes, Fracture Mechanics : 13th Conference, / ASTM STP 743, R. Roberts, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1981, p 476-02 12. M.H. Sharobeam and J.D. Landes, The load separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics. / Int. J. Fract. 47, 81-04 (1991) CrossRef 13. M.H. Sharobeam and J.D. Landes, The load separation and ηpl development in pre-cracked specimen test records. / Int. J. Fract. 59, 213-26 (1993) 14. ASTM E1820-09e1, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness,-ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States 15. P.R. Sreenivasan and S.L. Mannan, Dynamic J-R curves and tension-impact properties of AISI 308 stainless steel weld. / Int. J. Fract. 101, 229-49 (1999) CrossRef 16. A.N. Cassanelli, H. Ortiz, J.E. Wainstein, and L.A. deVedia, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics: 32nd Vol., / ASTM STP 1406, R. Chona, Ed., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001, p 49-2 17. A.N. Cassanelli, R. Cocco, and L.A. de Vedia, Separability property and ηpl factor in ASTM A387-Gr22 steel plate. / Eng. Fract. Mech. 70, 1131-142 (2003) CrossRef 18. G. Sasikala and S.K. Ray, Evaluation of quasistatic fracture toughness of a modified 9Cr-1Mo (P91) steel. / Mater. Sci. Eng. A 479, 105-11 (2008) CrossRef 19. ASTM E23-12c, “Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials,- / Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 20. ASTM E399-90 e1, 2009, “Standard Test Method for Linear- Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness / K Ic of Metallic Materials,- / Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 21. P.J. Maziasz and R.L. Klueh, E
刊物类别:Chemistry and Materials Science
刊物主题:Chemistry Characterization and Evaluation Materials Materials Science Tribology, Corrosion and Coatings Quality Control, Reliability, Safety and Risk Engineering Design
出版者:Springer New York
ISSN:1544-1024
文摘
K IA is increasingly being regarded as a characteristic fracture toughness below which cleavage fracture does not occur. Its evaluation from small-sized Charpy specimens would be advantageous for applications in power plant industries. In this study, K IA has been evaluated for P91 steel in various cold worked and thermally aged conditions. Evaluation of K IA requires determination of crack arrest load(P arrest) and crack arrest length(a arrest). The main challenge is in the determination of a arrest due to the non-availability of standard methodologies and the absence of unequivocal microstructural signatures on the fracture surface in this steel to identify crack arrest. a arrest has been determined using the analytical Key-Curve methodology which has proven successful for this steel in unaged condition. The applicability of the Key-Curve method is validated by the good agreement of the determined final crack length with that measured optically on unbroken specimens of N&T and subsequently 15% cold-worked P91 steel which had been previously aged at 650?°C for 5000?h. Mean K IA varies from 47.46?MPa√m (NT steel aged at 600?°C for 5000?h) to 69.85?MPa√m(NT?+?15% cw steel aged at 650?°C for 10000?h) for the various cold worked and aged datasets. K IA is found to be an average property unlike initiation toughness (K Jd) which shows statistical scatter. Mean K IA is found to be in reasonable agreement with the lower bound values of cleavage initiation toughness (K Jd) for the datasets in this study.