Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Mona E. Orady (1)
A. Karim Nawfal (1)
Ganesa Wegienka (2) - 关键词：Uterine fibroids ; Robotic hysterectomy ; DaVinci hysterectomy ; Uterine weight ; Large uterus
- 刊名：Journal of Robotic Surgery
- 出版年：2011
- 出版时间：December 2011
- 年：2011
- 卷：5
- 期：4
- 页码：267-272
- 全文大小：176KB
- 参考文献：1. De Frances CJ, Cullen KA, Kozak LJ (2007) National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. / Vital Health Stat 13 (165):1-09
2. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG (2007) Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 110:1091-095 CrossRef
3. Falcone T, Walters M (2008) Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 111:753-67 CrossRef
4. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 330:1478 CrossRef
5. Reich H (2007) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):337-44 CrossRef
6. Sokol AI, Green IC (2009) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(3):304-12 CrossRef
7. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 9:13-5
8. Reynolds RK, Advincula AP (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 191:55-0 CrossRef
9. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13:60-3 CrossRef
10. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:113.e1-
11. Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589-94 CrossRef
12. Chen CC, Falcone T (2009) Robotic Gynecologic Surgery: Past, Present, Future. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52(3):335-43 CrossRef
13. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery? J minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589-94 CrossRef
14. Payne TN, Dauterive FR, Pitter MC, Giep HN, Giep BN, Grogg TW, Shanbour A, Goff DW, Hubert HB (2010) Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices. Obstet Gynecol 115:535-42 CrossRef
15. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Mendivil A, Rossi E, Hanna R (2009) Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol 114:585-93 CrossRef
16. Piquion-Joseph J, Nayar A, Ghazaryan A, Papanna R, Klimek W, Laroia R (2009) Robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a community setting. J Robotic Surg 3:61-4 CrossRef
17. Kim H-B, Song J-E, Kim G-H, Cho H-Y, Lee K-Y (2010) Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300?grams. J Obstet Gynecol Res 36:656-60 CrossRef
18. Pitter MC, Anderson P, Blissett A, Pemberton N (2008) Robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: establishing training criteria: minimizing operative time and blood loss. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 4:114-20 CrossRef
19. Payne TN, Dauterinve FR (2010) Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve. J Robotic Surg 4:11-8 CrossRef
20. Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Colombo FM, Bagnoli A, Vianello F, Govomi F et al (2003) GNRH agonist treatment before total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:3316-319 CrossRef
21. Seracchioli R, Ventruroli S, Vianello F, Govoni F, Cantrelli M, Gualerzi B et al (2002) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:333-38 CrossRef
22. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Fiaccavento A, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Pouly J et al (2002) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very enlarged uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:125-30 CrossRef
23. Bonilla DJ, Mains L, Whitaker R, Crawford B, Finan M, Magnus M (2007) Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 52:490-98
24. Kho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Magrina JF (2009) Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 114(pt 1):231-35 CrossRef
25. Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J et al (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:312 CrossRef - 作者单位：Mona E. Orady (1)
A. Karim Nawfal (1)
Ganesa Wegienka (2)
1. Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology and Robotic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
2. Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
文摘
The objective of this study was to determine whether uterine weight affects the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RH) procedures. The design of this study is retrospective cohort study. The classification of the study design is level II-2 evidence. The study setting is the Henry Ford Health System’s Community Teaching Hospitals. One-hundred and thirty-five patients underwent RH for benign indications at one of two hospitals between January1, 2008, and June 1, 2010. Interventions were scheduled RH without concomitant uro-gynecologic procedures as the intention to treat. Patient demographics, age, height, weight, estimated blood loss (EBL), procedure duration, uterine weight, pathology, length of hospital stay (LOS), and any complications were obtained from a detailed review of electronic medical records. Uterine weight ranged from 47 to 1,290?g (<250?g, n?=?87; 250-00?g, n?=?28; >500?g, n?=?18). Overall, uterine weight was highly correlated with procedure duration (r?=?.53, P?<?.001.). Median procedure duration increased from 150?min for the <250?g group, to 205?min for the 250-00?g group, and to 295?min for the >500?g group. Uterine weight was also moderately correlated with EBL (r?=?.30, P?=?.0005). Median EBL increased from 50?ml for uteri <250?g to 87.5?ml for the 250-00?g group, and 100?ml for the >500?g group. This correlation did not persist in the assessment of decrease in peri-operative hemoglobin (r?=?.09, P?=?.30). Ninety-one women had a LOS of 1?day (67.4%), 31 women had a LOS of 2?days (23%), and 13 women had a LOS of greater than 2?days (9.6%). Uterine weight was not correlated with LOS (r?=?.14, P?=?.10) and was not associated with increased major or minor complications (WRS P?=?.79) re-admission (WRS P?=?.35), or blood transfusion (n?=?3). RH can be performed on patients with large uteri exceeding 500?g without associated adverse outcomes. Although procedure duration is increased, there is no significant effect on EBL and no increase in the occurrence of complications or length of stay.