Design of effective subsidy policy to develop green buildings: from the perspective of policy benefit

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Weidong Chen ; Xueying Hong
• 关键词：Green buildings ; Subsidy policy ; Policy benefit ; Asymmetric information ; Principal ; agent model
• 刊名：Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：April 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：17
• 期：4
• 页码：1029-1038
• 全文大小：427 KB
• 参考文献：Bierbrauer F (2009) A note on optimal income taxation, public goods provision and robust mechanism design. J Public Econ 93:667-70View Article
  Boza-Kiss B, Moles-Grueso S (2013) Evaluating policy instruments to foster energy efficiency for the sustainable transformation of buildings. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:163-76View Article
  Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Gastaldi M (2013) Financial analysis for investment and policy decisions in the renewable energy sector. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.-007/?s10098-014-0839-z
  De Schepper Ellen, Van Passel Steven, Lizin Sebastien et al (2014) Cost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium[J]. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1107-118View Article
  DeCanio SJ (1993) Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments. Energy Policy 21:906-14
  Dietl HM, Grossmann M, Lang M et al (2013) Incentive effects of bonus taxes in a principal-agent model. J Econ Behav Organ 89:93-04View Article
  Earnhart DH, Khanna M, Lyon TP (2014) Corporate environmental strategies in emerging economies. Rev Environ Econ Policy 8:164-85. doi:10.-093/?reep/?reu001 View Article
  Farinelli U, Yokobori K, Fengqi Z (2001) Energy efficiency in China. Energy Sustain Dev 12:32-8View Article
  Fernandez Mario, Martinez Arturo et al (2014) A mathematical model for the sustainability of the use of cross-laminated timber in the construction industry: the case of Spain. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.-007/?s10098-014-014-0738-3
  Financial Department of Shaanxi Province (2012) http://?www.?shaanxi.?gov.?cn/-/?xxgk/-/-/-/-33/-85/-93/-444/-8596.?htm
  Geller H, Harrington P, Rosenfeld AH et al (2006) Polices for increasing energy efficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy 34:556-73View Article
  Hassan R (2008) A systematic methodology for optimizing the energy performance of buildings in Bahrain. Energy Build 40:1297-303View Article
  Iwaro J, Mwasha A (2010) A review of building energy regulation and policy for energy conservation in developing countries. Energy Policy 38:7744-755View Article
  Korhonen PJ, Syrjanen MJ (2003) Evaluation of cost efficiency in Finnish electricity distribution. Ann Oper Res 121:105-22View Article
  Lan Y, Zhao R, Tang W (2011) A bilevel fuzzy principal-agent model for optimal nonlinear taxation problems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10:211-32View Article
  Lee WL, Yik FWH (2002) Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing energy efficiencies of buildings in Hong Kong. Appl Energy 71:251-74View Article
  Lee WL, Yik FWH (2004) Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiency. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30:477-99View Article
  Mahlia TM (2004) Methodology for predicting market transformation due to implementation of energy efficiency atandards and labels. Energy Convers Manag 45:1785-793View Article
  Mahmoudi Hacence, Ghaffour Noreddine (2008) Capacity building strategies and policy for desalination using renewable energies in Algeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2:1-
  Marou?ek J, Ha?kova S, Zeman R et al (2014) Assessing the implications of EU subsidy policy on renewable energy in Czech Republic. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.-007/?s10098-014-0800-1
  Mirrlees J (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev Econ Stud 38:175-08View Article
  MOHURD (2006) Evaluation standard for green building. GB/T 50378
  MOHURD (2012) Green Building Action Plan http://?jjs.?mof.?gov.?cn/?zhengwuxinxi/?tongzhigonggao/-01205/?t20120507_-48962.?html
  Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J Econ Theory 18:301-17View Article
  Nadel S, Geller H (1996) Utility DSM: What have we learned? Where are we going? Energy Policy 24:289-02View Article
  National Bureau of Statistics (2012) China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Peking
  National Development and Reform Commission, MOHURD (2013) http://?www.?gov.?cn/?zwgk/-013-01/-6/?content_-305793.?htm
  Qian QK, Chan EH, Choy LH (2013) How transaction costs affect real estate developers entering into the building energy efficiency(BEE) market? Habitat Int 37:138-47View Article
  Rommel J, Verhoest K (2014) Exploring effects of coordination on the autonomy of regulators: energy regulators in Belgium. Int Rev Admin Sci 80:298-17View Article
  Shanghai Building Energy Efficiency projects measures and special support (2012) http://?www.?ciac.?sh.?cn/?newsdata/?news19432.?htm
  Thomsen KB, Wittchen KB (2009). European national strategies to move towards very low energy buildings[M]. SBi, Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University. Ibsn: 978-87-563-1329-2
  Thormark Catarina (2002) A low energy building in a life cycle—its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential. Build Environ 37:429-35View Article
  US Green Building Council
• 作者单位：Weidong Chen (1)
  Xueying Hong (1)
  
  1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, People’s Republic of China
  
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Industrial and Production Engineering
  Industrial Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  Industrial Pollution Prevention
  Environmental Economics
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1618-9558

文摘

In order to promote the development of Green Building Market without bringing heavy financial burden to the government, this paper studies the optimal subsidy problem in Green Building Market from the perspective of policy benefit, in which the government and the end-user are the principals and the developer is their agent. Optimal subsidy principal-agent models under conditions of asymmetric information and complete information are established, and equivalent models are presented to get the optimal solutions. The results show that from the perspective of policy benefits, subsidy policy is influenced by construction costs, transfer paid by the end-user and developer’s preference toward green buildings. Furthermore, comparisons of models under two conditions demonstrate that eliminating asymmetric information can contribute to more green building areas and fewer unit subsidies. Finally, a numerical example is presented to show the effectiveness of the model.