- journal_title：Geophysics
- Contributor：William J. Hinze ; Carlos Aiken ; John Brozena ; Bernard Coakley ; David Dater ; Guy Flanagan ; René Forsberg ; Thomas Hildenbrand ; G. Randy Keller ; James Kellogg ; Robert Kucks ; Xiong Lee ; Andre Mainville ; Robert Morin ; Mark Pilkington ; Donald Plouff ; Dhananjay Ravat ; Daniel Roman ; Jamie Urrutia-Fucugauchi ; Marc Véronneau ; Michael Webring ; Daniel Winester
- Publisher：Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Date：2005-
- Format：text/html
- Language：en
- Identifier：10.1190/1.1988183
- journal_abbrev：Geophysics
- issn：0016-8033
- volume：70
- issue：4
- firstpage：J25
- section：GRAVITY EXPLORATION METHODS
The North American gravity database as well as data-bases from Canada, Mexico, and the United States are being revised to improve their coverage, versatility, and accuracy. An important part of this effort is revising procedures for calculating gravity anomalies, taking into account our enhanced computational power, improved terrain databases and datums, and increased interest in more accurately defining long-wavelength anomaly components. Users of the databases may note minor differences between previous and revised database values as a result of these procedures. Generally, the differences do not impact the interpretation of local anomalies but do improve regional anomaly studies. The most striking revision is the use of the internationally accepted terrestrial ellipsoid for the height datum of gravity stations rather than the conventionally used geoid or sea level. Principal facts of gravity observations and anomalies based on both revised and previous procedures together with germane metadata will be available on an interactive Web-based data system as well as from national agencies and data centers. The use of the revised procedures is encouraged for gravity data reduction because of the widespread use of the global positioning system in gravity fieldwork and the need for increased accuracy and precision of anomalies and consistency with North American and national databases. Anomalies based on the revised standards should be preceded by the adjective “ellipsoidal” to differentiate anomalies calculated using heights with respect to the ellipsoid from those based on conventional elevations referenced to the geoid.