Redefining RECs: Additionality in the voluntary Renewable Energy Certificate market.

详细信息   

• 作者：Gillenwater ; Michael Wayne.
• 学历：Doctor
• 年：2013
• 关键词：Renewable Energy Certificate REC) ; Renewable Port
• 导师：Oppenheimer,Michael,eadvisorGlaser,Alexanderecommittee memberWilson,Elizabethecommittee member
• 毕业院校：Princeton University
• Department：Public and International Affairs.
• ISBN：9781303096129
• CBH：3562127
• Country：USA
• 语种：English
• FileSize：5180748
• Pages：251

文摘

In the United States,electricity consumers are told that they can "buy" electricity from renewable energy projects,versus fossil fuel-fired facilities,through participation in a voluntary green power program. The marketing messages communicate to consumers that their participation and premium payments for a green label will cause additional renewable energy generation and thereby allow them to claim they consume electricity that is absent pollution as well as reduce pollutant emissions. Renewable Energy Certificates RECs) and wind energy are the basis for the majority of the voluntary green power market in the United States. This dissertation addresses the question: Do project developers respond to the voluntary REC market in the United States by altering their decisions to invest in wind turbines? This question is investigated by modeling and probabilistically quantifying the effect of the voluntary REC market on a representative wind power investor in the United States using data from formal expert elicitations of active participants in the industry. It is further explored by comparing the distribution of a sample of wind power projects supplying the voluntary green power market in the United States against an economic viability model that incorporates geographic factors. This dissertation contributes the first quantitative analysis of the effect of the voluntary REC market on project investment. It is found that 1) RECs should be not treated as equivalent to emission offset credits,2) there is no clearly credible role for voluntary market RECs in emissions trading markets without dramatic restructuring of one or both markets and the environmental commodities they trade,and 3) the use of RECs in entity-level GHG emissions accounting i.e.,"carbon footprinting") leads to double counting of emissions and therefore is not justified. The impotence of the voluntary REC market was,at least in part,due to the small magnitude of the REC price signal and lack of long-term contracts that would reduce the risk of relying on revenue the voluntary green power market. Although no simple solutions are identified,a proposal for integrating RECs into a load based cap-and-trade system is presented.