Cyber warfare as a form of conflict: Evaluation of models of cyber conflict as a prototype to conceptual analysis.
详细信息   
  • 作者:Liles ; Samuel P. ; III.
  • 学历:Doctor
  • 年:2012
  • 导师:Rogers,Marcus,eadvisorDietz,J. Ericecommittee memberLarson,Deanecommittee memberRaskin,Victorecommittee member
  • 毕业院校:Purdue University
  • Department:Technology.
  • ISBN:9781267774941
  • CBH:3545307
  • Country:USA
  • 语种:English
  • FileSize:3676235
  • Pages:126
文摘
In April 2007,what has been incorrectly called the first cyber war and since then referred more correctly as a cyber riot,an attack on the domain name systems and the various servers of Estonia occurred. It was perpetrated by ethnic Russians living in Estonia who were incensed by the movement of a bronze war memorial for Russian soldiers to a grave yard from the center of town Evron,2008,p. 122). The cyber riot was nearly simultaneous with the actual real world riots. This brought the idea of cyber warfare and conflict in cyberspace into the public view. It may be better to replace the idea of asymmetric threats with the idea of strategic threats as the threat may not be asymmetric e.g. large scale cyber warfare) but the adversarys strategy is asymmetric in effort. If according to Clausewitz,we are willing to accept that there are two primary things needed for war politically opposed will-power and the ability to field a military) then a missing element of cyber warfare may be the ability to field a military Szafranski,1990,p. 39). This research states,"Given the unstructured domain of cyber warfare knowledge a specific model will allow experts to produce a concept map significantly more detailed than absent the model." Experts were solicited in a variety of venues to map cyber warfare using a concept mapping process and provide a deeper understanding of the concept. Two technology-centric models were given to groups of experts to assist them in explaining elements of cyber conflict. One group was just given the cyber warfare question and no specific model as guidance. The groups were then compared to see if either of the models had better explanatory power per the experts responses.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700