Immunohistochemical analysis of bone resorption regulators (RANKL and OPG), angiogenic index, and myofibroblasts in syndrome and non-syndrome odontogenic keratocysts

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Cassiano Francisco Weege Nonaka^a ; Roberta Barroso Cavalcante^b ; Renato Luiz Maia Nogueira^c ; Lé ; lia Batista de Souza^a ; Leã ; o Pereira Pinto^a ; ^{leao.p.pinto@gmail.com}
• 关键词：Odontogenic keratocyst ; Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand ; Osteoprotegerin ; CD34 ; Myofibroblast ; Immunohistochemistry
• 刊名：Archives of Oral Biology
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：25_00039969
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：March, 2012
• 卷：57
• 期：3
• 页码：230-237
• 文件大小：911 K

摘要

Objective

The aim of this study was to immunohistochemically analyse bone resorption regulators (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand [RANKL] and osteoprotegerin [OPG]), angiogenic index, and myofibroblasts in Gorlin syndrome-related odontogenic keratocysts (SOKCs) and non-syndrome odontogenic keratocysts (NSOKCs).

Study design

Twenty-two SOKCs, 22 primary NSOKCs, and eight recurrent NSOKCs were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using anti-RANKL and anti-OPG antibodies. The angiogenic index was determined by microvessel count (MVC) using anti-CD34 antibody. Anti-伪-smooth muscle actin (伪-SMA) antibody was used for the identification of myofibroblasts.

Results

Analysis of the expression of RANKL and OPG in the epithelial lining and fibrous capsule did not reveal significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). In the epithelial lining, the RANKL/OPG ratio was RANKL < OPG and RANKL = OPG in most primary NSOCKs (54.5%) and SOKCs (59.1%), respectively (P > 0.05). In the fibrous capsule, the ratio was RANKL = OPG in most primary (81.8%) and recurrent NSOKCs (75.0%) and in most SOKCs (45.5%) (P > 0.05). No significant differences in the angiogenic index or number of myofibroblasts were observed between primary NSOKCs, recurrent NSOKCs, and SOKCs (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The present results suggest that differences in the biological behaviour of SOKCs and NSOKCs may not be related to the expression of RANKL and OPG, to the RANKL/OPG ratio, to the angiogenic index, or to the number of myofibroblasts in these lesions.