Using multi-objective optimisation in the design of CO<sub>2sub> capture systems for retrofit to coal power stations
- 作者：Trent Harkin<sup>asup><sup> ; sup><sup>bsup><sup> ; sup><sup>tharkin@co2crc.comsup> ; Andrew Hoadley<sup>bsup> ; Barry Hooper<sup>asup>
- 关键词：Multi-objective optimisation ; Carbon capture ; Carbonate
- 刊名：Energy
- 出版年：2012
- 期刊代码：11_03605442
- 类别：pw
- 出版时间：May, 2012
- 卷：41
- 期：1
- 页码：228-235
- 文件大小：626 K
摘要
An Aspen Plus庐 simulation of an existing power station with a potassium carbonate based carbon capture (CCS) plant including CO<sub>2sub> compression is combined with an Excel based genetic algorithm to optimise the net power output of the power station and amount of CO<sub>2sub> captured for a range of solvent flowrates, lean loading and stripper pressures. The net power output was compared for a CCS plant that is added to the power station without any heat integration to a system where heat integration is maximised by the use of pinch analysis and linear optimisation to calculate the amount of steam required to be extracted from the turbine to meet the additional heating requirements of the CCS plant. The multi-objective optimisation of the process identified that lean solvent loading and stripper pressure will have a large impact on the net power output and amount of CO<sub>2sub> captured. The curves developed in the multi-objective optimisation can provide not only the ability to determine the CO<sub>2sub> capture rate to maximise the profit at a given time due to fluctuating electricity prices, but will also provide the optimum solvent flowrate and lean loading to achieve that maximum capture rate for a given net power. The paper shows that the design of the optimum carbon capture plant will depend not only on the specific capture process but also on the conditions of the power station and the importance in optimising the whole process at the same time. The minimum energy penalty for the potassium carbonate system combined with the reference power station modeled in this paper is 1.02聽MJ<sub>esub>/kgCO<sub>2sub> with a reboiler regeneration energy of 5.3聽MJ<sub>thsub>/kgCO<sub>2.sub> In this example optimisation and heat integration was able to reduce the energy penalty by 0.4聽MJ<sub>esub>/kgCO<sub>2sub>.