Privacy, anonymity and liability: Will anonymous communicators have the last laugh?
- 作者：Lisa Collingwood1 ; L.Collingwood@kingston.ac.uk ; [Author Vitae]
- 关键词：Privacy ; Anonymity ; Disclosure procedures ; Human rights ; Freedom of expression ; Data protection ; Norwich Pharmacal orders
- 刊名：Computer Law and Security Report
- 出版年：2012
- 期刊代码：26_02673649
- 类别：cp
- 出版时间：June, 2012
- 卷：28
- 期：3
- 页码：328-334
- 文件大小：206 K
摘要
In this paper, the author sets out the way in which the UK approach to privacy protection is able to extend its reach to anonymous postings. Whilst anonymity might sometimes be seen as one of the essential characteristics of communicating on-line, it does not provide an impenetrable veil of protection in respect of a privacy violation claim. Instead, there are avenues available to identify anonymous communicators, which have implications both for internet freedom and jurisdiction in cyberspace. In the UK, our common law has not denied bloggers, or other on-line contributors, anonymity per se. However, it will be argued that recent UK judgments represent a warning to anonymous communicators that they can be held liable for what they post on-line and that naivety is no defence at law. Whilst on-line platforms allow people to effectively become journalists; to become publishers, as familiar users, they should become more aware of the consequences of their on-line postings and appreciate that they will not be able to escape from the application of third party disclosure orders. However, as these are not without their problems, it is possible that anonymous communicators may have the last laugh.