Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything?

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Nallamothu ; Brahmajee K. ; Bates ; Eric R.
• 刊名：The American Journal of Cardiology
• 出版年：2003
• 期刊代码：5_00029149
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：October 1, 2003
• 卷：92
• 期：7
• 页码：824-826
• 文件大小：84.7 K

摘要

The mortality benefit associated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may be lost if door-to-balloon time is delayed by >1 hour as compared with fibrinolytic therapy door-to-needle time. Interventional cardiology laboratories endeavoring to achieve the benefits of primary percutaneous coronary intervention seen in randomized clinical trials should aim to match their short door-to-balloon times.