We have performed systematic measureme
nts of the efficie
ncy,
name="mml12">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml12&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=3a18034433ba455dbb32de06b790930f" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">CE=ncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/2329.gif" alt="left angle bracket" title="left angle bracket" border="0">TLOγncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/232a.gif" alt="right-pointing angle bracket" title="right-pointing angle bracket" border="0">/ncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/2329.gif" alt="left angle bracket" title="left angle bracket" border="0">TLOEncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/232a.gif" alt="right-pointing angle bracket" title="right-pointing angle bracket" border="0">, of MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) a
nd LiB
name="mml13">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml13&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=cae8e54dfc8fba6f657052e96e1e7ea5" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">(Li2B4O7:Mn,Si) thermolumi
nesce
nce (TL) detectors exposed to electro
n radiotherapy beams of
nomi
nal e
nergy 6, 9, 12, 16 a
nd 20 MeV relative to Co-60 or 6 MV photo
n beams (
name="mml14">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml14&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=1ac1774a54883281acef310003697767" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">ncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/2329.gif" alt="left angle bracket" title="left angle bracket" border="0">TLOncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/232a.gif" alt="right-pointing angle bracket" title="right-pointing angle bracket" border="0"> is the average TL output of a batch of detectors exposed to a give
n dose of photo
n beam radiatio
n or to a beam of electro
ns of e
nergy
name="mml15">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml15&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=389ce0ab90b68294b2d30c4f1c250d1a" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">E). The TL detectors were si
ntered pellets of 4.5 mm diameter a
nd ca. 0.8 mm thick
ness. Detectors were exposed i
n water to 2 Gy at respective e
nergy-depe
nde
nt depths
name="mml16">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml16&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=ac3f6cd377ee17d78e1e7d48bae77211" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">dmax applied i
n cli
nical dosimetry. The obtai
ned results were re-calculated versus mea
n electro
n e
nergy i
n the beam at depths
name="mml17">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml17&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=83d8a474477c346c1dbfcda23e24a601" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">dmax. We fou
nd that, for cli
nical purposes, both types of TL detectors show
no e
nergy depe
nde
nce: prese
nted as average values over the i
nvestigated e
nergy ra
nge, for MTS-N detectors
name="mml18">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml18&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=95abbd31e9b4ecefd85b5f1fe9141adb" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">ncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/2329.gif" alt="left angle bracket" title="left angle bracket" border="0">CEncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/232a.gif" alt="right-pointing angle bracket" title="right-pointing angle bracket" border="0">=1.07±1.1% a
nd for LiB
name="mml19">n:none; color:black" href="/science?_ob=MathURL&_method=retrieve&_udi=B6TVS-4R7RSB0-3&_mathId=mml19&_user=1067359&_cdi=5542&_rdoc=162&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_userid=10&md5=40e37fcc5badbf263978b4196c6fede1" title="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">ncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/2329.gif" alt="left angle bracket" title="left angle bracket" border="0">CEncedirect.com/scidirimg/entities/232a.gif" alt="right-pointing angle bracket" title="right-pointing angle bracket" border="0">=1.03±1.7%. Thus, while
no correctio
n is required for dose values estimated by LiB TLDs, the u
nder-respo
nse of MTS-N detectors exposed to a beam of electro
ns has to be corrected by about 7%. At mea
n e
nergy of electro
ns i
n therapeutic electro
n beams below about 5 MeV a decli
ne i
n the respo
nse of both types of TL detectors is observed.