Factors shaping submerged bryophyte communities: A conceptual model for small mountain streams in Germany

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Horst Tremp^a ; ^{tremp@uni-landau.de} ; Dorothea Kampmann^b ; Ralf Schulz^a
• 关键词：Aquatic bryophytes ; Distribution patterns ; Species response curves ; Water Framework Directive
• 刊名：Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：11_00759511
• 类别：abs
• 出版时间：September, 2012
• 卷：42
• 期：3
• 页码：242-250
• 文件大小：652 K

摘要

Several models explaining species composition of aquatic bryophytes are available for specific regions. However, a more general, conceptual model applicable to a broader range of regions is lacking.

We present a conceptual model ranking environmental factors determining submerged bryophyte communities in small mountain streams. It was tested on a dataset of 54 stream sections after removing the effect of stream size and altitude. Species responses were modeled with pH as predictor variable based on 97 stream sites covering six mountain regions all over Germany. Multiple regressions revealed the importance of primary growth factors (light, Ep(CO₂)) and substrate for the total submerged bryophyte coverage.

The known distinction of hard- and softwater bryoflora was clearly supported. The floristic composition of headwaters was predominantly determined by the bicarbonate/ionic strength complex. Species response to pH values supported this result and thus our conceptual model. The primary growth resources light, Ep(CO₂) and availability of coarse streambed material explained one third (R_adjusted² = 0.34) of total submerged bryophyte cover. Disturbances, predominantly spates, reduce biomass but do not affect the basic floristic structure.

In conclusion, conceptual models and monitoring methods focusing on aquatic bryophytes need to clearly distinguish 鈥渁quatic鈥?from 鈥渟ubmersed by chance鈥? All 鈥渁quatic bryophytes鈥?found in Germany can also occur at least temporarily at non-submerged sites. Therefore, a distinction between primary growth factors and additional resources is recommended to disentangle factors determining aquatic bryophyte communities.