In this study, we compared the results of two chamber based methods against a reference estimate based on eddy covariance measurements. In the first method, 螖Csoil was calculated by subtracting Rhet from the litter input into the soil. In the second method, Rfloor was subtracted from the entire allocation of carbon (C) into the soil. A four-year detailed dataset of C dynamics of a drained peatland forest in southern Finland served as the test material.
The Rhet method produced results close to those of the reference method, but the results were sensitive to the choice of root turnover rates used in the estimation of litter input. The Rfloor method resulted in a clear underestimation of soil C sink: the accurate estimation of the large photosynthesis and respiration fluxes needed for the calculation turned out to be difficult.
In our opinion, the Rhet method could be used to identify hot spots of forest soil CO2 emissions and for balance estimation for large areas. Further development of models for estimating the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes is needed for the application of the Rfloor method. As the estimation of 螖Csoil by subtracting C output from C input is inherently sensitive to bias in the estimation of the input and output, the accuracy of both methods needs further testing with extensive datasets.