Chamber measured soil respiration: A useful tool for estimating the carbon balance of peatland forest soils?
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要
Peatlands drained for forestry have a high potential for CO2 emissions due to peat decomposition. Accurate estimates of either these emissions or soil carbon balances (螖Csoil) on large areas are needed for national greenhouse gas inventories and as input for earth system models. The measurement of forest floor respiration (Rfloor) or heterotrophic soil respiration (Rhet) by portable chambers offers an affordable tool for extensive studies. So far, the reliability of respiration chamber based calculations of 螖Csoil has not been tested and the prerequisites for their use have not been discussed. However, the method is being used in greenhouse gas inventories.

In this study, we compared the results of two chamber based methods against a reference estimate based on eddy covariance measurements. In the first method, 螖Csoil was calculated by subtracting Rhet from the litter input into the soil. In the second method, Rfloor was subtracted from the entire allocation of carbon (C) into the soil. A four-year detailed dataset of C dynamics of a drained peatland forest in southern Finland served as the test material.

The Rhet method produced results close to those of the reference method, but the results were sensitive to the choice of root turnover rates used in the estimation of litter input. The Rfloor method resulted in a clear underestimation of soil C sink: the accurate estimation of the large photosynthesis and respiration fluxes needed for the calculation turned out to be difficult.

In our opinion, the Rhet method could be used to identify hot spots of forest soil CO2 emissions and for balance estimation for large areas. Further development of models for estimating the photosynthesis and respiration fluxes is needed for the application of the Rfloor method. As the estimation of 螖Csoil by subtracting C output from C input is inherently sensitive to bias in the estimation of the input and output, the accuracy of both methods needs further testing with extensive datasets.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700