Pieloplastia abierta frente a laparosc贸pica: revisi贸n de nuestra serie y descripci贸n de nuestra t茅cnica de pieloplastia laparosc贸pica
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要

ass="h4">Introduction and objectives

Pyeloplasty has always been the treatment of choice for ureteropelvic junction obstruction at our center, where a laparoscopic approach has been used in the last 4 years to perform this procedure. Results of open pyeloplasty (OP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) performed at our center in the past 8 years are compared, and our laparoscopic procedure is described.

ass="h4">Materials and methods

Pyeloplasties performed at our center from June 2000 to June 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical presentation, involved kidney function, operating time, intraoperatory bleeding, presence of kidney stones or crossing vessels, length of hospital stay, possible complications, and results obtained were analyzed in each case.

ass="h4">Results

Thirty pyeloplasties were performed, 15 OP and 15 LP (50%). Mean operating time was 167.6 minutes for LP (100-240) and 106 minutes for OP (75-180) (P<.0001). Mean hospital stay was 6.6 days (4-16) for LP and 9.1 days for OP (5-26) (P>.05). Intraoperative bleeding was negligible in all patients and no peroperative complications occurred. However, 9 patients (30%) experienced postoperative complications, 5 out of 15 LPs (33.3%) and 4 out of 15 OPs (26.7%) (P>.05). Urinary fistula was the most common complication, occurring in 3 of the 30 patients (10%).

Procedure was successful in all 15 patients undergoing OP (100%) and in 14 of the 15 patients undergoing LP (93.3%) (P>.05).

ass="h4">Conclusions

LP is currently the procedure of choice at our center because of its lower morbidity and similar results to OP, despite the need for a certain laparoscopic skill and a usually longer opertating time.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083

电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700