- 作者：Tzu-I Chien ; Jin-Ying Lu ; Jau-Tsuen Kao ; Tai-Fen Lee ; Shu-Yuan Ho ; Chia-Yu Chang ; Chao-Wei Liu ; Chun-Hsien Lee ; Shiao-Ni Yan ; Jui-Yi Yang ; et al.
- 关键词：Urinalysis ; Automated ; Comparison
- 刊名：Clinica Chimica Acta
- 出版年：2007
- 期刊代码：54_00098981
- 类别：med
- 出版时间：2 February 2007
- 卷：377
- 期：1-2
- 页码：98-102
- 文件大小：305 K
Our study is aimed to determine the performance of 3 automated urinalysis systems—Clinitek Atlas, Urisys 2400 and Aution Max.
Methods
One thousand urine specimens were analyzed with the 3 automated systems. The results of the 3 assays were compared for testing urine chemistry and evaluating the capacity of leukocyte esterase and nitrite to detect bacteriuria.
Results
The correlation between the 3 instruments represented as within 1 grading difference was better between the Atlas and Aution Max systems for pH, blood, glucose, urobilinogen, ketone and specific gravity. For protein and nitrite, better correlation was observed between the Atlas and Urisys 2400, while the Aution Max and Urisys 2400 conveyed better correlation for bilirubin and white blood cells. The sensitivity and specificity of both the leukocyte esterase and nitrite in screening for significant bacteriuria were 71.7, 58.9, 70.8%and 99.1, 99.1 and 97.2%, for the Clinitek Atlas, Aution Max and Urisys 2400, respectively.
Conclusions
The automated urinalysis systems demonstrate acceptable correlations with each other in urine chemistries, especially between the Clinitek Atlas and Aution Max systems on the majority of items. The specificity and negative predictive value of leukocyte esterase and nitrite of the 3 instruments for screening of significant bacteriuria were sufficient to avoid unnecessary urine culture.