Using ³He/⁴He isotope ratios to identify the source of deep reservoir contributions to shallow fluids and soil gas

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Sarah J. Mackintosh ; ^{sarah.mackintosh@nottingham.ac.uk} ; Chris J. Ballentine
• 关键词：CCS ; Reservoir microseepage ; Soil gas ; Helium ; Isotopes ; Noble gases
• 刊名：Chemical Geology
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：12_00092541
• 类别：ear
• 出版时间：18 April, 2012
• 卷：304-305
• 期：Complete
• 页码：142-150
• 文件大小：977 K

摘要

One strategy to counteract rising atmospheric CO₂ levels is the capture and subsequent geological storage of anthropogenic CO₂. Legislation will require the monitoring and early identification of any leakage to the near surface from the storage site. Owing to their low concentrations and unreactive nature, noble gases are well established as key tracers of crustal fluid systems (Ballentine et al., 2002). The ³He/⁴He and noble gas content of soil gases and groundwater may provide the opportunity to detect, identify and quantify a weak, deep-sourced signal that contributes to a larger, near-surface biological signal. We present ³He/⁴He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe data from near-surface soil gases, two of which exhibit hydrocarbon microseepage from deeper oil reservoirs from the Teapot Dome oil field, Wyoming, USA. We also present a noble gas characterisation of the oil reservoirs beneath the seepages. A helium excess (⁴He_excess up to 37.7 ppm) relative to air concentrations (⁴He_air = 5.24 ppm) is found in soil gases at both microseepage sites. Error propagation demonstrates that it is possible to unambiguously resolve the ³He/⁴He of the deep helium source and allows us to explore the limits of this technique. At one seep the resolved deep ³He/⁴He = 0.055 卤 0.009Ra (where Ra = 1.40 脳 10^鈭?#xA0;6) is indistinguishable from the range observed in the subsurface hydrocarbon system of 0.046 to 0.109Ra. Notably the soil gas ⁴He/CH₄ = 1.8 脳 10^鈭?#xA0;3 at this microseepage site compares similarly with the lower subsurface source ⁴He/CH₄ = 1.4 to 3.4 脳 10^鈭?#xA0;4 and demonstrates the conservative nature of helium as a tracer. We show that the sensitivity of helium as a deep fluid tracer should be increased by up to two orders of magnitude in groundwater compared to soil gases studied here due to the low solubility of helium in water. Groundwater rather than soil gas should be the priority in any monitoring strategy that plans to use helium as an early indicator of deep fluid microseepage.