Evaluation of 1:5 soil to water extract electrical conductivity methods
- 作者：Yangbo He<sup>asup> ; Thomas DeSutter<sup>asup><sup> ; sup><sup>Thomas.Desutter@ndsu.edusup> ; Lyle Prunty<sup>asup> ; David Hopkins<sup>asup> ; Xinhua Jia<sup>bsup> ; Douglas A. Wysocki<sup>csup>
- 关键词：EC ; electrical conductivity ; EC1 ; 5 ; electrical conductivity of 1 ; 5 soil to water extract ; ECe ; electrical conductivity of saturated paste extract
- 刊名：Geoderma
- 出版年：2012
- 期刊代码：28_00167061
- 类别：ear
- 出版时间：September, 2012
- 卷：185-186
- 期：Complete
- 页码：12-17
- 文件大小：240 K
摘要
Conducting a 1:5 soil:water extract to measure electrical conductivity (EC) is an approach to assess salinity and has been the preferred method in Australia, but not commonly used in the United States where the 1:1 soil to water ratio is preferred. The objectives of this research were to 1) compare methods of agitation for determining EC<sub>1:5sub> and 2) to determine optimal times for equilibration for each method across a range of salinity levels determined from EC values achieved from saturated paste extracts (EC<sub>esub>). Soils evaluated for this study were from north central North Dakota (USA) and had EC<sub>esub> values ranging from 0.96 to 21.2 dS m<sup>鈭?#xA0;1sup>. For each method, nine agitation times were used, up to 48 h. The three agitation methods were shaking plus centrifuging, shaking, and stirring. Agitation methods resulted in significantly different EC<sub>1:5sub> values for 13 out of 20 soils across the three agitation methods, and shaking plus centrifuging was significantly different (p = 0.05) from stirring for all soils. In addition, 75%of the shaking plus centrifuging soils were significantly different from shaking. Based on these results, methods were analyzed separately for optimal equilibration times. The agitation times required for the three methods to reach 95 and 98%of equilibration were a function of the level of soil salinity. For soils with EC<sub>esub> values below 4 dS m<sup>鈭?#xA0;1sup>, over 24 h was needed to obtain both 95 and 98%of equilibration for the three methods. However, less than 3 and 8 h were needed to reach 95 and 98%equilibration, respectively, across methods for soils having EC<sub>esub> values greater than 4 dS m<sup>鈭?#xA0;1sup>. These results indicate that investigating the effect of agitation methods and times is important to help reduce variations across EC<sub>1:5sub> measurements.