What鈥檚 in a title? An assessment of whether randomized controlled trial in a title means that it is one

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Despina Koletsi^a ; Nikolaos Pandis^b ; ^{npandis@yahoo.com} ; Argy Polychronopoulou^c ; Theodore Eliades^d
• 刊名：American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：11_08895406
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：June, 2012
• 卷：141
• 期：6
• 页码：679-685
• 文件大小：192 K

摘要

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Introduction

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether studies published in orthodontic journals and titled as randomized clinical trials are truly randomized clinical trials. A second objective was to explore the association of journal type and other publication characteristics on correct classification.

Methods

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, European Journal of Orthodontics, Angle Orthodontist, Journal of Orthodontics, Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, World Journal of Orthodontics, Australian Orthodontic Journal, and Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics were hand searched for clinical trials labeled in the title as randomized from 1979 to July 2011. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, and univariable and multivariable examinations of statistical associations via ordinal logistic regression modeling (proportional odds model).

Results

One hundred twelve trials were identified. Of the included trials, 33 (29.5%) were randomized clinical trials, 52 (46.4%) had an unclear status, and 27 (24.1%) were not randomized clinical trials. In the multivariable analysis among the included journal types, year of publication, number of authors, multicenter trial, and involvement of statistician were significant predictors of correctly classifying a study as a randomized clinical trial vs unclear and not a randomized clinical trial.

Conclusions

From 112 clinical trials in the orthodontic literature labeled as randomized clinical trials, only 29.5%were identified as randomized clinical trials based on clear descriptions of appropriate random number generation and allocation concealment. The type of journal, involvement of a statistician, multicenter trials, greater numbers of authors, and publication year were associated with correct clinical trial classification. This study indicates the need of clear and accurate reporting of clinical trials and the need for educating investigators on randomized clinical trial methodology.