Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of organochlorine pesticides residues in honey by gas chromatography-electron capture and ion trap mass spectrometric detection

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Constantinos K. Zacharis^a ; ^b ; ^{czacharis@gmail.com} ; ^{czach@food.teithe.gr} ; Ilias Rotsias^a ; Petros G. Zachariadis^a ; Anastasios Zotos^a
• 关键词：Dispersive liquid&ndash ; liquid microextraction ; Organochlorine pesticides ; Gas chromatography&ndash ; mass spectrometry ; Electron capture ; Honey
• 刊名：Food Chemistry
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：48_03088146
• 类别：abs
• 出版时间：1 October, 2012
• 卷：134
• 期：3
• 页码：1665-1672
• 文件大小：634 K

摘要

A simple dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) protocol for the determination of 15 organochlorine pesticides residues in honey is proposed. The selected pesticides were separated using gas chromatography and detected by electron capture (ECD) or ion trap mass spectrometry (GC-IT/MS). Several parameters affecting the extraction efficiency namely type and volume of organic extraction solvent, type and volume of disperser solvent, sample pH, ionic strength, extraction time and centrifugation speed were systematically investigated. The final DLLME protocol involved the addition of 750 渭L acetonitrile (disperser) and 50 渭L chloroform (extraction solvent) into a 5 mL aqueous honey solution followed by centrifugation. The sedimented organic phase (chloroform) were analysed directly by GC-IT/MS or evaporated and reconstituted in acetonitrile prior to the GC-ECD analysis. The analytical performance of the GC-ECD and GC-IT/MS methods was compared and discussed. Under the selected experimental conditions, the enrichment factors varied between of 36 and 114. The limits of detection (LOD) were in the range of 0.02-0.15 渭g L^鈭? (0.4-3 ng g^鈭?) for GC-ECD and 0.01-0.2 渭g L^鈭? (0.2-4 ng g^鈭?) for GC-IT/MS which is adequate to verify compliance of products to legal tolerances. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of the selected organochlorine pesticides residues in various honey samples obtained from Greek region. Mean recoveries were ranged from 75%to 119%while the precision was better than 20%in both methodologies.