Point prevalence and risk factors of hospital acquired infections in a cluster of university-affiliated hospitals in Shiraz, Iran

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Mehrdad Askarian^a ; ^{askariam@sums.ac.ir} ; Mahnaz Yadollahi^b ; Ojan Assadian^c
• 关键词：Hospital acquired infection ; Nosocomial infection ; Point prevalence ; Risk factor ; Iran
• 刊名：Journal of Infection and Public Health
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：P95_18760341
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：April, 2012
• 卷：5
• 期：2
• 页码：169-176
• 文件大小：237 K

摘要

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Summary

Background

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are critical and mostly preventable complications that occur in hospitalized patients and lead to major health and economic burdens. Most of the information on HAI risk factors and the recommended preventive measures is based on data acquired from only a few countries. The aim of this point prevalence HAI study conducted in Shiraz, Iran, was to study the local epidemiology of HAIs and the major risk factors for acquiring HAIs in a Middle-Eastern region.

Methods

The study employed four identical point prevalence surveys in eight university hospitals, each consisting of 60-700 beds. The study was conducted during all four season of 2008-2009. All of the patients admitted for 鈮?8 h were studied, although the patients admitted to emergency wards were excluded. A standardized data collection form that included name, age, gender, presence or absence of HAI, administration of any antibiotics, insertion of a central line, use of an endotracheal tube, mechanical ventilation, and use of an urinary catheter was completed for each patient. The HAI definitions used in this study were based on the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) guidelines.

Results

Data from 3450 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed. The overall HAI prevalence was 9.4%. The most common HAIs were blood stream infections (2.5%), surgical site infections (2.4%), urinary tract infections (1.4%), and pneumonia (1.3%). A logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratio OR for males rather than females acquiring infections was 1.56 (95%confidence interval [CI] 1.21-2.02). Other HAI risk factors included using a central intravascular catheter, adjusted OR of 3.86 (95%CI 2.38-6.26), and using an urinary catheter, adjusted OR of 3.06 (95%CI 2.19-4.28). Being admitted to an ICU was not an independent HAI risk factor. For all HAIs, the OR of acquiring infection was 3.24 (95%CI 2.34-4.47) in the patients with hospital stays longer than eight days. A high discrepancy between HAIs and antibiotic use was observed. Antibiotics were administered to 71%of the patients, but only 9.4%of the patients also had at least one documented infection.

Conclusion

This point prevalence study showed that HAIs are frequent in Shiraz university hospitals, and that the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics is high. The results imply that more primary prevention efforts are necessary to address HAIs associated with using indwelling devices and to prevent surgical site infections.