Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a commercial vaccine against different antigenic groups of H9N2 influenza viruses in chickens

详细信息	查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

• 作者：Yipeng Sun^a ; ¹ ; Juan Pu^a ; ¹ ; Lihong Fan^a ; Honglei Sun^a ; Jingjing Wang^a ; Yi Zhang^a ; Linqing Liu^a ; Jinhua Liu^a ; ^b ; ^{ljh@cau.edu.cn}
• 关键词：Avian influenza virus ; H9N2 ; Antigenic drift ; Vaccine
• 刊名：Veterinary Microbiology
• 出版年：2012
• 期刊代码：106_03781135
• 类别：abs
• 出版时间：23 April, 2012
• 卷：156
• 期：1-2
• 页码：193-199
• 文件大小：568 K

摘要

Despite the long-term vaccination programs implemented in China, H9N2 avian influenza viruses (AIVs) continue to persist in chicken populations, even in vaccinated flocks. We previously demonstrated that H9N2 AIV isolated from chickens in China also underwent antigenic drift and evolved into distinct antigenic groups (C, D and E). To understand whether antigenic drift of viruses away from the vaccine strain partially contributed to the circulation of H9N2 AIV in China, we evaluated the protective efficacy of a commercial vaccine against different antigenic groups of H9N2 AIV. Challenge experiments using vaccinated chickens indicated that the vaccine prevented shedding of antigenic group C viruses, but not those of the more recent groups D and E. Vaccinated chickens, even those with vaccine-induced HI titers of 1:1024, shed virus after being infected with A/chicken/Shandong/ZB/2007, a representative virus of antigenic group D. Genetic analysis showed that the representative viruses of antigenic groups D and E possessed greater numbers of amino acid substitutions in the hemagglutinin protein compared to the vaccine strain and the antigenic group C virus, and many of which were located in antigenic sites. Our results indicated that the persistence of H9N2 AIV in China might be due to incomplete vaccine protection, and that the avian influenza vaccine should be regularly evaluated and updated to maintain optimal protection. Furthermore, the avian influenza vaccination policy also needs to be re-assessed, and increased veterinary biosecurity on farms, rather than vaccine application alone, should be implemented to prevent and control avian influenza.