• 作者：Joaquí ; n Mould-Quevedo^a ; Iris Contreras-Herná ; ndez^a ; ^{iriscontrerash@gmail.com} ; ^{arangurejm@hotmail.com} ; Wá ; scar Verduzco^b ; Juan Manuel Mejí ; a-Aranguré ; ^c ; Juan Garduñ ; o-Espinosa^a
• 关键词：Esquizofrenia ; An&aacute ; lisis de coste-efectividad ; Antipsicó ; ticos ; Antipsicó ; ticos tí ; picos ; Antipsicó ; ticos atí ; picos
• 刊名：Revista de Psiquiatr铆a y Salud Mental
• 出版年：2009
• 期刊代码：pca395_18889891
• 类别：psy
• 出版时间：July-September 2009
• 卷：2
• 期：3
• 页码：108-118
• 文件大小：298 K

Introduction

Estimation of the economic costs of schizophrenia is a fundamental tool for a better understanding of the magnitude of this health problem. The aim of this study was to estimate the costs and effectiveness of five antipsychotic treatments (ziprasidone, olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol and clozapine), which are included in the national formulary at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, through a simulation model.

Methods

Type of economic evaluation: complete economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Study perspective: direct medical costs. Time horizon: 1 year. Effectiveness measure: number of months free of psychotic symptoms. Analysis: to estimate cost-effectiveness, a Markov model was constructed and a Monte Carlo simulation was carried out.

Results

Effectiveness: the results of the Markov model showed that the antipsychotic with the highest number months free of psychotic symptoms was ziprasidone (mean 9.2 months). The median annual costs for patients using ziprasidone included in the hypothetical cohort was 194,766.6 Mexican pesos (MXP) (95%CI, 26,515.6-363,017.6 MXP), with an exchange rate of 1 鈧?= 17.36 MXP. The highest costs in the probabilistic analysis were estimated for clozapine treatment (260,236.9 MXP).

Conclusions

Through a probabilistic analysis, ziprasidone showed the lowest costs and the highest number of months free of psychotic symptoms and was also the most costeffective antipsychotic observed in acceptability curves and net monetary benefits.