12 healthy subjects (mean age 29.4xA0;卤xA0;6.9 years) were studied at both 1.5xA0;T and 3xA0;T. Two different positions of the acquisition slab were evaluated; in one acquisition the imaging slab included the carotid siphon (鈥淪low鈥?, in the other acquisition the imaging slab was placed superior to the carotid siphon (鈥淪high鈥?. Subjective image quality of cerebral arteries was assessed independently by two readers on a 4-point scale. Relative Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) was determined for the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery.
Subjective image quality of the anterior cerebral artery (segments A1, A2) was significantly higher at 1.5xA0;T as compared to 3xA0;T, while 3xA0;T provided significantly higher image quality for segment P3 of the posterior cerebral artery. For the middle cerebral artery (segments M1-M3), image quality was significantly higher at 1.5xA0;T than at 3xA0;T when the carotid siphon was included in the acquisition slab (鈥淪low鈥?, while no significant difference was found between 1.5xA0;T and 3xA0;T with 鈥淪high鈥? Relative SNR was significantly higher at 1.5xA0;T (23.1xA0;卤xA0;5.1) as compared to 3xA0;T (12.1xA0;卤xA0;7.8) for 鈥淪low鈥?and significantly higher at 3xA0;T (29.8xA0;卤xA0;5.9) than at 1.5xA0;T (24.2xA0;卤xA0;3.6) for 鈥淪high鈥?
Our results indicate that 4D SSFP MRA should preferably be performed at 1.5xA0;T with inclusion of the carotid siphon in the acquisition slab, which might be required for the assessment of intracranial collateral flow.