Autoevaluaci贸n de una v铆a cl铆nica para mejora del proceso quir煤rgico carcinoma de recto
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要

class="h4">Objectives

To analyse whether the self-evaluation of a clinical pathway improves the results of rectal cancer (RC) treatment.

class="h4">Patients and method

Patients operated on for RC were divided into 3 groups according to biannual modifications of a clinical pathway analysing several indicators.

class="h4">Results

166 patients: Group A: 2002 鈥?#xA0;3 n=50, B: 2004 鈥?#xA0;5 n=53 and C: 2006 鈥?#xA0;7 n=63, without any differences in age, gender or comorbidity. Preoperative study improved with the introduction of CT scan: 76%in Group C vs. 6%in Group A (P<0.001). All Group C tumours were staged using MR, rectal ultrasound or both, compared to 84%in Group A (P<0.001). The rate of abdominal-perineal resections was reduced from 42%(Group A) to 17%(Group C); (P=0.007) and about 48%of surgeons in Group A vs. 94%in the C had a specific activity in coloproctology (P<0.001). The average lymph node count was: Group A=6.2卤4.5 vs. 13卤6.5 in the C and circumferential margin analysis was reported in 24%of Group A vs. 76%in Group C (P<0.001). Parameters such as perioperative blood transfusion, ICU admission, use of nasogastric tube, early feeding or epidural analgesia also improved progressively. Operative mortality decreased non-significantly to 4.7%and anastomotic leaks from 24%to 9.5%with a reduction in postoperative stay from 15 to 11 days during the period analysed (P=0.029).

class="h4">Conclusions

Several indicators have significantly improved in a relatively short period of time due to self-evaluations of the process.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700