摘要
state that their results confirm the conclusion of J. that the pyroxene in Wark-Lovering rims () found on Ca-, Al-rich refractory inclusions has lower Ti3+/Titot ratios than the primary pyroxene in the interiors of inclusions. While true, the claim is misleading because J. concluded that there was no Ti3+ in the rims, whereas found Ti3+ in 41 of 42 new rim analyses. In addition, J. concluded that rims formed under much more oxidizing conditions, log fOb>2b> 猢?#xA0;IW-1, or 猢?-7 log units higher, than inclusion interiors. The conclusions of J. were disputed by S. and are not supported by the new data of . The present work is intended for clarification of this and other issues.