Spatiotemporal dynamics of early spatial and category-specific attentional modulations
- 作者：Andreas A. Ioannides ; a.ioannides@humanbraindynamics.com ; Vahe Poghosyan
- 关键词：MFT ; magnetic field tomography ; RAC ; regional activation curve ; LO ; lateral occipital ; pFus ; posterior fusiform ; AI ; attentional index
- 刊名：NeuroImage
- 出版年：2012
- 期刊代码：83_10538119
- 类别：neu
- 出版时间：15 April, 2012
- 卷：60
- 期：3
- 页码：1638-1651
- 文件大小：1871 K
摘要
Different attention types select and focus brain resources on relevant sensory information. However, key questions remain unresolved: when and where cortical visual processing is first modulated by different types of attention? How do such modulatory effects spread thereafter? Here, we address these issues for spatial and category-specific types of attention using magnetoencephalography (MEG). First we identified the dynamics of visual attention-independent sensory processing to serve as a baseline framework for the attentional modulations of interest. We found that visual information is processed through the entire hierarchy of visual areas in at least two phases, in the 40-130 ms and 130-230 ms periods respectively. Spatial attention modulations were identified from the beginning of the initial stimulus-evoked response in the primary visual cortex ~ 70 ms post-stimulus. Category-specific attention modulated face processing beginning from the first face-specific response in high-level object-related areas ~ 100 ms post-stimulus, substantially earlier than previously reported for face-directed attention. Thus both attention types modulated responses during the first processing phase, beginning at the earliest brain area capable of coding the attentional target. Thereafter attentional effects propagated through the visual cortex together with the stimulus-evoked activity. Category-specific attention did not affect the first-phase responses in low-level strongly retinotopic visual areas, while the second-phase responses were enhanced when the stimulus was the response target and reduced when it was a distractor. Responses during both phases in high-level object-related areas were enhanced by category-specific attention independent of their target/distractor status. Spatial attention effects were stronger in low-level areas, whereas category-specific attention effects were stronger in high-level object-related areas.