Repeated sequential computed tomography scanning of the descending aorta of eight beagle dogs (5 male, 12.7 卤 3.1 kg) was performed without table movement with a standardized CT scan protocol. Iopromide 300 (300 mg I/mL), iopromide 370 (370 mg I/mL) and iomeprol 400 (400 mg I/mL) were administered via a foreleg vein with an identical iodine delivery rate of 1.2 g I/s and a total iodine dose of 300 mg I/kg body weight. Time-enhancement curves were computed and analyzed.
Iopromide 300 showed the highest peak enhancement (445.2 卤 89.1 HU), steepest up-slope (104.2 卤 17.5 HU/s) and smallest full width at half maximum (FWHM; 5.8 卤 1.0 s). Peak enhancement, duration of FWHM, enhancement at FWHM and up-slope differed significantly between iopromide 300 and iomeprol 400 (p < 0.05). Except for enhancement at FWHM there were no significant differences between iopromide 300 and iopromide 370 and iopromide 370 and iomeprol 400 (p > 0.05).
Low viscous iopromide 300 results in a better defined bolus with a significantly higher peak enhancement, steeper up-slope and smaller FWHM when compared to iomeprol 400. These characteristics potentially affect contrast timing.