• 作者：O. Dí ; ez-Ascaso ; P. Martinez-Sá ; nchez ; B. Fuentes ; E. Dí ; ez-Tejedor ; ^{ediez@meditex.es} ; ^{ediez.hulp@salud.madrid.org}
• 关键词：Ictus ; Percepció ; n ; Factores de riesgo ; Comunicació ; n mé ; dico-paciente
• 刊名：Neurolog铆a
• 出版年：2011
• 期刊代码：pca262_02134853
• 类别：med
• 出版时间：March 2011
• 卷：26
• 期：2
• 页码：81-91
• 文件大小：176 K

Background

Stroke was historically attributed to magical and religious conceptions. We analyse the self-perception of stroke in stroke patients, the knowledge of vascular risk factors (VRF), and doctor-patient communication efficacy from an anthropological perspective.

Material and methods

Prospective study of stroke patients by semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Those with modified Rankin Scale > 3, aphasia or severe dysarthria were excluded. The quality of the information from health staff to the patients, as well as the evaluation of this information by the health staff themselves, were analysed.

Results

The study included 100 patients (56 men), with a mean age of 61 (SD 16) years. Low educational level was present in 51%. Up to 83%did not know what was happening with the first stroke symptoms, and only 56%went to an emergency department initially. Only 19%could identify all their vascular risk factors (VRF), and up to 57%thought that the cause was due to a fortuitous factor. Poor knowledge of stroke was associated with low educational level (OR: 2.81; 95%CI, 1.14-6.90, P = .024). Up to 75%of the patients did not understand the information provided by their doctor, but 65%felt well informed. Furthermore, up to 69%of physicians thought that patients were well informed; the same percentage felt that low educational level made communication difficult.

Conclusions

The knowledge of stroke and its VRF in stroke patients is low. They perceive it as something fortuitous associated to a strong emotional impact. Communication between doctors and stroke patients is relatively poor, although neither physicians nor patients detect this fact. This poor knowledge of stroke and VRF could have a negative influence on secondary prevention compliance.