Optimisation of the tumour response threshold in patients treated with everolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Analysis of response and progression-free survival in the RECORD-1 study
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要

Background and objectives

Objective response as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is low among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted agents, despite significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS). A modified response threshold may be more clinically meaningful than RECIST for identifying patients who may derive a PFS benefit from targeted therapy.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the phase III RECORD-1 trial of everolimus versus placebo in patients with mRCC who had failed sunitinib or sorafenib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ). A series of tumour response thresholds, defined by the best change in the sum of the longest tumour diameters (螖SLD) of target lesions, was evaluated to distinguish 鈥榬esponders鈥?from 鈥榥on-responders鈥?with respect to significant improvement in PFS.

Results

The optimal threshold for determining a response to everolimus was 鈭?%螖SLD. At this threshold, median PFS was 8.4 months in responders and 5.0 months in non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.6-3.7).

Conclusion

In patients who have failed vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy, everolimus affords superior PFS to placebo, regardless of change in tumour burden. However, a 猢?%reduction in SLD is a better predictor of PFS benefit than the classical 猢?0%reduction used with RECIST.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700