We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the phase III RECORD-1 trial of everolimus versus placebo in patients with mRCC who had failed sunitinib or sorafenib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ). A series of tumour response thresholds, defined by the best change in the sum of the longest tumour diameters (螖SLD) of target lesions, was evaluated to distinguish 鈥榬esponders鈥?from 鈥榥on-responders鈥?with respect to significant improvement in PFS.
The optimal threshold for determining a response to everolimus was 鈭?%螖SLD. At this threshold, median PFS was 8.4 months in responders and 5.0 months in non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.6-3.7).
In patients who have failed vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy, everolimus affords superior PFS to placebo, regardless of change in tumour burden. However, a 猢?%reduction in SLD is a better predictor of PFS benefit than the classical 猢?0%reduction used with RECIST.