Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA and cytology in suspected tubercular intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy is a common diagnostic challenge faced by clinicians. In the absence of palpable peripheral nodes, tissue is usually obtained from the abdominal nodes by image-guided biopsy or surgery. We speculate that EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) avoids the morbidity of a laparotomy and might be equally effective.

Objective

To evaluate the role of EUS-FNA in abdominal lymphadenopathy.

Design

Prospective study conducted over 42 months.

Setting

Tertiary care center in New Delhi, India.

Patients

Patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy in whom image-guided node biopsy failed were considered for EUS-FNA.

Intervention

A total of 3 passes were performed at each site. Slides were prepared per protocol and sent for cytopathologic evaluation.

Results

A total of 142 patients were enrolled, but only 130 (91.5%) underwent FNA. The mean lymph node size was 22 卤 3.2 mm; 71.8%of the nodes were hypoechoic (n = 102), and 28.1%were heterogeneous with an anechoic center (n = 40). In 120 patients (84.5%), the lymph nodes were intra-abdominal only, and in 22 patients (15.5%), they were both intra-abdominal and mediastinal in location.

Main Outcome Measurement

EUS-FNA was successful in establishing a diagnosis in 90.8%of these patients; 76.1%were found to have tuberculosis, 7.04%sarcoidosis, 6.33%Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 0.74%non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Limitations

In 8.4%patients, nodes were inaccessible because of their retropancreatic location.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA is a safe, accurate, and minimally invasive modality for diagnosing the cause of abdominal lymphadenopathy. In highly endemic areas, tuberculosis is the most common cause.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700