Does the sequence of data collection influence participants鈥?responses to closed and open-ended questions? A methodological study
详细信息查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
摘要

Background

The sequence used for collecting quantitative and qualitative data in concurrent mixed-methods research may influence participants鈥?responses. Empirical evidence is needed to determine if the order of data collection in concurrent mixed methods research biases participants鈥?responses to closed and open-ended questions.

Objectives

To examine the influence of the quantitative-qualitative sequence on responses to closed and open-ended questions when assessing the same variables or aspects of a phenomenon simultaneously within the same study phase.

Design

A descriptive cross-sectional, concurrent mixed-methods design was used to collect quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interview) data. The setting was a large multi-site health care centre in Canada.

Methods

A convenience sample of 50 registered nurses was selected and participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two sequences for data collection, quantitative-qualitative or qualitative-quantitative.

Analysis

Independent t-tests were performed to compare the two groups鈥?responses to the survey items. Directed content analysis was used to compare the participants鈥?responses to the interview questions.

Results

The sequence of data collection did not greatly affect the participants鈥?responses to the closed-ended questions (survey items) or the open-ended questions (interview questions).

Conclusions

The sequencing of data collection, when using both survey and semi-structured interviews, may not bias participants鈥?responses to closed or open-ended questions. Additional research is required to confirm these findings.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700