Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- 作者：Araj ; G.F. ; Talhouk ; R.S. ; Simaan ; C.J. ; Maasad ; M.J.
- 关键词：MecA ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Methicillin resistance ; MRSA ; E-test ; Susceptibility testing
- 刊名：International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- 出版年：1999
- 期刊代码：126_09248579
- 类别：med
- 出版时间：January, 1999
- 卷：11
- 期：1
- 页码：47-52
- 文件大小：78.9 K
摘要
Conventional and molecular techniques are being used in the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus but they do not always show concordant results. In this study, a mecA PCR-based amplification was compared with the 1 μg oxacillin disk diffusion test and the Epsilometer test (E-test) for detection of MICs. Among 31 isolates initially characterized as MRSA by the disk diffusion test, mecA was detected in only 13 (42%) isolates. The E-test showed a wide range of oxacillin MICs (0.5−>256 μg/ml) among these 31 MRSA isolates: seven isolates had an MIC of >256 μg/ml, one had 64 μg/ml, two had 4 μg/ml, two had 3 μg/ml, one had 2.5 μg/ml, nine had 2 μg/ml, three had l.5 μg/ml, five had 1 μg/ml and one had 0.5 μg/ml. Comparing the mecA PCR results with the E-test oxacillin MIC findings revealed that mecA was detected in seven of eight isolates (87.5%) with an MIC of ≥64 μg/ml, in three of 14 isolates (21.4%) with an MIC of 2–4 μg/ml and in three of nine isolates (33.3%) with an MIC of <2 μg/ml. β-lactamase production was positive in 28/31 isolates (90.3%). Because of this variation between tests and since several resistance mechanisms are known to mediate methicillin resistance in S. aureus, the reliable detection of MRSA cannot be solely based on detection of mecA gene in S. aureus. At this stage and until new guidelines are introduced by an official body, such as NCCLS, a combination of conventional methods alone or together with a molecular method should be used every time S. aureus is tested for detection of methicillin resistance.