The study shows that personal integrity is a trademark of the review staff and there are sufficient support systems to ensure high quality. The partition between primary and independent review is positive, having different focus and staff with different skills and perspectives making the reviews, which implies supplementary roles. The process contributes to 鈥済etting the right things done the right way鈥? The study also shows that though efficient communication, feedback, processes for continuous improvement, and 鈥渓earning organizations鈥?are well known success factors in academia, it is not that simple to implement and accomplish in real life.
It is argued that future applications of safety review processes should focus more on communicating and clarifying the process and its adherent requirements, and improve the feedback system within the process.