In this paper we approach
trust management systems in a fuzzy logical setting. The idea is to provide a generalization of the classical framework, where
trust is understood via the dichotomy “true–false”. In order to overcome the classical approach proposed by Weeks, following the ideas used by Hájek, Esteva, Godo and others to deal w
ith probabil
ity, possibil
ity, and necess
ity in a many-valued logical setting, we introduce the modal logic
itle="View the MathML source" align="absbottom" border="0" height=23 width="79"/> built up over the many-valued logic
itle="View the MathML source" align="absbottom" border="0" height=23 width="32"/>. In particular, we enlarge the
itle="View the MathML source" align="absbottom" border="0" height=23 width="32"/> language by means of a binary modal
ity
says acting on pairs
itle="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">(pi,
ities/3d5.gif" alt="phi" title="phi" border="0">) of
principals and
assertions, where a principal is a propos
itional variable and an assertion is a propos
itional formula of a su
ited many-valued logic. The idea is to regard the evaluation of the modal formula
itle="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">says(pi,
ities/3d5.gif" alt="phi" title="phi" border="0">) as the
degree of confidence the principal itle="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">pi puts in the assertion itle="Click to view the MathML source" alt="Click to view the MathML source">
ities/3d5.gif" alt="phi" title="phi" border="0">. For
itle="View the MathML source" align="absbottom" border="0" height=23 width="79"/> we introduce a syntax, a semantic and we show completeness. Then we discuss the valid
ity of generalized modus ponens rule in our setting. Finally we deal w
ith a Pavelka-style extension of our logic, and we also extend
itle="View the MathML source" align="absbottom" border="0" height=23 width="79"/> to allow principals to be hierarchically organized.