Site-directed mutagenesis of glutamate 317 of bovine α-1,3Galactosyltransferase and its effect on enzyme activity: Implications for reaction mechanism
- 作者：Patricia Molina ; Ronald M.A. Knegtel ; Bruce A. Macher
- 关键词：Site-directed mutagenesis ; α ; -1 ; 3Galactosyltransferase ; Double-displacement reaction mechanism ; Modeling
- 刊名：Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)/General Subjects
- 出版年：2007
- 期刊代码：16_03044165
- 类别：bio
- 出版时间：August 2007
- 卷：1770
- 期：8
- 页码：1266-1273
- 文件大小：614 K
摘要
Bovine α1,3galactosyltransferase (α1,3GalT) transfers galactose from UDP-α-galactose to terminal β-linked galactosyl residues with retention of configuration of the incoming galactose residue. The epitope synthesized has been shown to be critical for xenotransplantation. According to a proposed double-displacement reaction mechanism, glutamate-317 (E317) is thought to be the catalytic nucleophile. The proposed catalytic role of E317 involves an initial nucleophilic attack with inversion of configuration and formation of a covalent sugar–enzyme intermediate between E317 and galactose from the donor substrate, followed by a second nucleophilic attack performed by the acceptor substrate with a second inversion of configuration. To determine whether E317 of α1,3GalT is critical for enzyme activity, site-directed mutagenesis was used to substitute alanine, aspartic acid, cysteine and histidine for E317. If the proposed reaction mechanism for the α1,3GalT enzyme is correct, E317D and E317H would produce active enzymes since they can act as nucleophiles. The non-conservative mutation E317A and conservative mutation E317C are predicted to produce inactive or very low activity enzymes since the E317A mutant cannot engage in a nucleophilic attack, and the E317C mutant would trap the galactose residue. The results obtained demonstrate that E317D and E317H mutants retained activity, albeit significantly less than the wild-type enzyme. Additionally, both E317A and E317C mutant also retained enzyme activity, suggesting that E317 is not the catalytic nucleophile proposed in the double-displacement mechanism. Therefore, either a different amino acid may act as the catalytic nucleophile or the reaction must proceed by a different mechanism.