论姚范《援鹑堂笔记》的选学评点成就
|
摘要
姚范的《援鹑堂笔记》是对经、史、子、集的考证辨误之作,具有一定的文献价值。他的选学评点成就集中体现于《援鹑堂笔记》卷三十七至卷三十九,内容涉及对《文选》地理名物的考证、诗文义理的品评、讹误的质疑校勘三个方面。姚范的选学批评基于何焯的《文选》评点意见,既有抄录又有阐发,不仅对何氏《义门读书记》有重要的补阙之用,而且其考证与评点亦独具特色。
Yao Fan's Notes on Quail Hall is a textual research and error diagnosis of classics, history, zi and ji, which has certain literature value. His achievements in anthology and evaluation are mainly reflected in volumes 37 to 39 of Notes on Quail Hall, which involve the textual research of geographical names, the evaluation of poetry and prose and the questioning and collating of errors. Yao Fan's criticism of anthology is based on the comments of He Zhuo on Selected Works, which is both transcribed and elucidated. It is not only supplementary for He Zhuo's Yimen Reading, but also unique in textual research and comments.
Yao Fan's Notes on Quail Hall is a textual research and error diagnosis of classics, history, zi and ji, which has certain literature value. His achievements in anthology and evaluation are mainly reflected in volumes 37 to 39 of Notes on Quail Hall, which involve the textual research of geographical names, the evaluation of poetry and prose and the questioning and collating of errors. Yao Fan's criticism of anthology is based on the comments of He Zhuo on Selected Works, which is both transcribed and elucidated. It is not only supplementary for He Zhuo's Yimen Reading, but also unique in textual research and comments.
引文
[1]梁启超.中国近三百年学术史[M].北京:人民出版社,2008:250.
[2]姚范.援鹑堂笔记50卷:卷37—卷39[M].清道光乙末刊本.1835:1-35.
[3]曾国藩.曾文正公书札:33卷[M].清光绪二年传忠书局刻增修本,1876:140.
[4]何焯.义门读书记[M].北京:中华书局,1987:934.
[5]李慈铭.越缦堂读书记[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2000:779.
[6]萧统.文选[M].李善,注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2017:1127.
[7]徐公持.嵇康《与山巨源绝交书》非绝交之书论[J].中华文史论丛,2008(3).
[8]童强.姚范《援鹑堂笔记》考述[J].古典文献研究,2003.
[9]周怀文.姚范及其《援鹑堂笔记》研究[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2006.
[10]王晓静.论方东树与《援鹑堂笔记》的整理[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2010.
[11]王晓静.《援鹑堂笔记》版本考[J].西南交通大学学报,2013(3).
[12]王晓静.姚范及其《援鹑堂笔记》述要[J].语文学刊,2009(24).
[13]温世亮.从《援鹑堂笔记》看姚范的诗学观[J].阅江学刊,2012(6).
[14]周怀文.桐城文学津梁——姚范[J].船山学刊,2009(2).
(1)关于《援鹑堂笔记》的专题论文还有周怀文《桐城文学津梁——姚范》、王晓静《姚范及其<援鹑堂笔记>考述》,暂不详论。
[2]姚范.援鹑堂笔记50卷:卷37—卷39[M].清道光乙末刊本.1835:1-35.
[3]曾国藩.曾文正公书札:33卷[M].清光绪二年传忠书局刻增修本,1876:140.
[4]何焯.义门读书记[M].北京:中华书局,1987:934.
[5]李慈铭.越缦堂读书记[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2000:779.
[6]萧统.文选[M].李善,注.上海:上海古籍出版社,2017:1127.
[7]徐公持.嵇康《与山巨源绝交书》非绝交之书论[J].中华文史论丛,2008(3).
[8]童强.姚范《援鹑堂笔记》考述[J].古典文献研究,2003.
[9]周怀文.姚范及其《援鹑堂笔记》研究[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2006.
[10]王晓静.论方东树与《援鹑堂笔记》的整理[D].芜湖:安徽师范大学,2010.
[11]王晓静.《援鹑堂笔记》版本考[J].西南交通大学学报,2013(3).
[12]王晓静.姚范及其《援鹑堂笔记》述要[J].语文学刊,2009(24).
[13]温世亮.从《援鹑堂笔记》看姚范的诗学观[J].阅江学刊,2012(6).
[14]周怀文.桐城文学津梁——姚范[J].船山学刊,2009(2).
(1)关于《援鹑堂笔记》的专题论文还有周怀文《桐城文学津梁——姚范》、王晓静《姚范及其<援鹑堂笔记>考述》,暂不详论。