摘要
刑事和解是种利益兼得的正和博弈。博弈论在刑事和解司法中的应用包含了对刑事和解过程中主体的动态行为选择研究与在研究的基础上寻找合作之路这两个主题。为了避免被害方与犯罪方或其中的一方对于各种策略选择的考量导致起初没有谁支持刑事和解或者一方支持而另一方不支持刑事和解陷入斗鸡博弈中两败俱伤的结局,必须运用扩展式博弈向犯罪方与被害方分析选择和解还是诉讼的议价区间。而建立类型案件诉讼的成本统计一览表能够促使刑事和解是被害方与犯罪方占优策略选择之纳什均衡出现。
Criminal reconciliation is a positive game in which both benefits are obtained. The application of game theory in criminal reconciliation judicature includes two topics: the research on the choice of dynamic behavior of the subject in the process of criminal reconciliation and the search for the way of cooperation on the basis of research. In order to avoid the consideration of all kinds of strategic choices between the injured party and the party or one of the offenders,it is necessary to use an extended game to make a compromise between the offender and the victim. It is the bargaining section of the lawsuit. And the establishment of the cost statistics list of types of case lawsuits can prompt the criminal reconciliation to be the Nash equilibrium of the victimization party and the criminal party's dominant strategy choice.
引文
[1]沈海平.寻求有效率的惩罚[D].北京大学2008年博士论文:312.
[2]赵汀阳.博弈问题的哲学分析[J].读书,2003(2):77.
[3]王春业,聂佳龙.论博弈语境下法的生成[J].甘肃理论学刊,2011(4):140.
[4]王春业、聂佳龙.外部不经济理论视角下的权利冲突分析[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2012(1):48.
[5][美]道格拉斯·拜尔,罗伯特·格特纳,兰德尔·皮克.法律的博弈分析[M].严旭阳译,北京:法律出版社,1999:1.