微创血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效及安全性
|
摘要
目的探究微创血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效及安全性。方法选取本院在2013年1月—2017年12月收治的高血压脑出血患者40例作为研究对象。将其随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组均为20例;对照组采取常规开颅血肿清除术治疗,治疗组采取微创血肿清除术治疗,比较两组治疗后的临床效果。结果治疗组治疗无效者为2例,对照组治疗无效者为9例,治疗组患者的总疗效率为90.00%,对照组患者的总疗效率为55.00%,治疗组患者的总疗效效果优于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论微创血肿清除术对治疗高血压脑出血具有显著效果。
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive hematoma removal in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods From January 2013 to December 2017, 40 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were selected as the study objects and they were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated by minimally invasive hematoma removal, Compare the clinical effects of the two groups after treatment. Results In the treatment group, 2 cases were ineffective in treatment, and 9 cases were ineffective in the control group. The total efficacy rate was 90.00% in the treatment group and 55.00% in the control group. The total effect of the treatment group was better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive hematoma removal is effective in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive hematoma removal in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods From January 2013 to December 2017, 40 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were selected as the study objects and they were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated by minimally invasive hematoma removal, Compare the clinical effects of the two groups after treatment. Results In the treatment group, 2 cases were ineffective in treatment, and 9 cases were ineffective in the control group. The total efficacy rate was 90.00% in the treatment group and 55.00% in the control group. The total effect of the treatment group was better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion Minimally invasive hematoma removal is effective in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.
引文
[1]单伟.微创穿刺术及小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(2):97-98.
[2]叶富跃,杨堃,郑传宜,等.颅内微创血肿清除术与传统开颅清除血肿手术在高血压脑出血中的应用效果分析[J].河北医学,2016,22(1):17-20.
[3]郑海军,曾上飞.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗重症高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(2):327-329.
[4]魏栋辉.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗老年高血压脑出血的疗效观察[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(8):57-58.
[5]孙新庆.微创血肿清除术结合肝素生理盐水持续冲洗治疗高血压脑出血疗效观察[J].医药论坛杂志,2016,37(6):96-97.
[6]罗华.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效及安全性探讨[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(18):3349-3350.
[7]陶云川,邓光红.微创血肿清除术与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效比较观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2013,6(7):128-129.
[8]刘畅,金晓东.高血压脑出血微创血肿清除术治疗分析[J].医学综述,2013,19(7):1326-1327.
[9]孙旭,杨东波,蒋传路.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床疗效分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2013,47(2):164-167,170.
[10]陈红林.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效[J].中外医疗,2017,36(1):50-52.
[11]王坚.微创血肿穿刺清除术治疗脑出血患者临床效果分析[J].现代实用医学,2017,29(5):636-637.
[12]秦建武,周文科.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血的临床疗效分析[J].中国民康医学,2017,29(18):53-54.
[13]李宁,刘斐,李晋虎,等.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血的疗效分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(2):79-80.
[2]叶富跃,杨堃,郑传宜,等.颅内微创血肿清除术与传统开颅清除血肿手术在高血压脑出血中的应用效果分析[J].河北医学,2016,22(1):17-20.
[3]郑海军,曾上飞.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗重症高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(2):327-329.
[4]魏栋辉.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗老年高血压脑出血的疗效观察[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2016,19(8):57-58.
[5]孙新庆.微创血肿清除术结合肝素生理盐水持续冲洗治疗高血压脑出血疗效观察[J].医药论坛杂志,2016,37(6):96-97.
[6]罗华.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效及安全性探讨[J].现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(18):3349-3350.
[7]陶云川,邓光红.微创血肿清除术与开颅血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效比较观察[J].临床合理用药杂志,2013,6(7):128-129.
[8]刘畅,金晓东.高血压脑出血微创血肿清除术治疗分析[J].医学综述,2013,19(7):1326-1327.
[9]孙旭,杨东波,蒋传路.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压性基底节区脑出血的临床疗效分析[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2013,47(2):164-167,170.
[10]陈红林.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效[J].中外医疗,2017,36(1):50-52.
[11]王坚.微创血肿穿刺清除术治疗脑出血患者临床效果分析[J].现代实用医学,2017,29(5):636-637.
[12]秦建武,周文科.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血的临床疗效分析[J].中国民康医学,2017,29(18):53-54.
[13]李宁,刘斐,李晋虎,等.微创颅内血肿清除术治疗脑出血的疗效分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(2):79-80.