智能制造跨学科研究团队知识关联整合的影响因素——扎根理论的应用案例
|
摘要
知识整合与思维关联是跨学科科研获得成功的关键。选取智能制造领域的典型跨学科研究团队为研究对象,以扎根理论为主导工具进行探索性研究,得出结论:知识关联整合受到知识因素(知识整合)、主体因素(思维关联)及合作因素(知识吸收能力)影响,其中,知识因素是动力基础,主体因素起到认知调节作用,合作因素是重要支撑条件。最后针对知识关联整合影响因素的主要内容和理论模型,提出跨学科研究组织建设及管理要点。
Knowledge integration and thinking connection are the key to the success of cross-disciplinary scientific research. In this paper, the typical interdisciplinary research team in the field of intelligent manufacturing is selected as the research object, and the rooting theory is taken as the leading tool to conduct exploratory research, and the conclusion is drawn: knowledge association integration is influenced by knowledge factors(knowledge integration), subject factors(thinking relevance) and cooperative factors(knowledge absorption ability). Among them, the knowledge factor is the power foundation, the main body factor plays the cognitive adjustment function, the cooperation factor is the important support condition. Finally, aiming at the main content and theoretical model of the influencing factors of knowledge association integration, the paper puts forward the key points of interdisciplinary research organization construction and management.
Knowledge integration and thinking connection are the key to the success of cross-disciplinary scientific research. In this paper, the typical interdisciplinary research team in the field of intelligent manufacturing is selected as the research object, and the rooting theory is taken as the leading tool to conduct exploratory research, and the conclusion is drawn: knowledge association integration is influenced by knowledge factors(knowledge integration), subject factors(thinking relevance) and cooperative factors(knowledge absorption ability). Among them, the knowledge factor is the power foundation, the main body factor plays the cognitive adjustment function, the cooperation factor is the important support condition. Finally, aiming at the main content and theoretical model of the influencing factors of knowledge association integration, the paper puts forward the key points of interdisciplinary research organization construction and management.
引文
[1]刘征驰,张晓换,石庆书.开放式创新下的专用性知识获取[J].软科学,2015, 7(29):51-55.
[2]BECK R, RAI A, FISCHBACH K, et al. Untangling knowledge creation and knowledge integration in enterprise wikis[J].Journal of Business Economics, 2015,85(4):389-420.
[3]黄超,杨英杰.大学跨学科合作的学科整合机制及其模式选择[J].高教探索,2016(12):5-12.
[4]杨英杰,黄超.大学跨学科研究合作的动力机制与政策影响[J].高教探索,2013(2):16-22.
[5]汪小梅,白利娟,袁薇.组织知识创造能力分析与综合评价[J].软科学,2006,20(6):19-21.
[6]ZHANG L, HE J. Sharing tacit knowledge for integrated project team flexibility:case study of integrated project delivery[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013,139(7):795-804.
[7]王晓红,金子祺,姜华.跨学科团队的知识创新及其演化特征:基于创新单元和创新个体的双重视角[J].科学学研究,2013(5):732-741.
[8]陈英和,张淳俊.基于跨学科概念图的跨学科知识整合模型[J].北京师范大学学报,2010(1):37-44.
[9]夏立明,王丝丝,张成宝.PPP项目再谈判过程的影响因素内在逻辑研究:基于扎根理论[J].软科学,2017,1(31):136-140.
[10]李志刚,李兴旺.蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究:扎根理论研究方法的运用[J].管理科学,2006(3):2-7.
[11]CHARMAZ K. Grounded theory methods in social justice research[M]//DENZINN K, LINCOLN Y S. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, Inc,2011:359-380.
[12]CUTCLIFFE JR. Methodological issues in grounded theory[J].Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000(31):1476-1484.
[13]SUDDABY R. From the editors:what grounded theory is not[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006(49):633-642.
[14]张宝生,张庆普.基于扎根理论的知识型组织成员知识隐藏行为前因研究[J].科学进步与对策, 2017,10(34):105-110.
[15]杨冉冉,龙如银.基于扎根理论的城市居民绿色出行行为影响因素理论模型探讨[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,67(5):13-18.
[16]BANDURA A. Social learning theory[M]. New York:General Learning Press, 1977.
[17]廖成林,袁艺.基于社会认知理论的企业内知识分享行为研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2009(3):137-139.
[18]CUMMINGS J N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization[J].Management Science,2004,50(3):352-364.
[19]HSU M H, JU T L, YEN C H, et al. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities:the relationship between trust, self-efficacy,and outcome expectations[J].International Journal of HumanComputer Studies,2007,65(2):153-169.
[20]王斌,廖振鹏.基于三元交互理论ERP实施绩效及作用机理研究[J].软科学, 2011(6):49-53.
[2]BECK R, RAI A, FISCHBACH K, et al. Untangling knowledge creation and knowledge integration in enterprise wikis[J].Journal of Business Economics, 2015,85(4):389-420.
[3]黄超,杨英杰.大学跨学科合作的学科整合机制及其模式选择[J].高教探索,2016(12):5-12.
[4]杨英杰,黄超.大学跨学科研究合作的动力机制与政策影响[J].高教探索,2013(2):16-22.
[5]汪小梅,白利娟,袁薇.组织知识创造能力分析与综合评价[J].软科学,2006,20(6):19-21.
[6]ZHANG L, HE J. Sharing tacit knowledge for integrated project team flexibility:case study of integrated project delivery[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013,139(7):795-804.
[7]王晓红,金子祺,姜华.跨学科团队的知识创新及其演化特征:基于创新单元和创新个体的双重视角[J].科学学研究,2013(5):732-741.
[8]陈英和,张淳俊.基于跨学科概念图的跨学科知识整合模型[J].北京师范大学学报,2010(1):37-44.
[9]夏立明,王丝丝,张成宝.PPP项目再谈判过程的影响因素内在逻辑研究:基于扎根理论[J].软科学,2017,1(31):136-140.
[10]李志刚,李兴旺.蒙牛公司快速成长模式及其影响因素研究:扎根理论研究方法的运用[J].管理科学,2006(3):2-7.
[11]CHARMAZ K. Grounded theory methods in social justice research[M]//DENZINN K, LINCOLN Y S. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications, Inc,2011:359-380.
[12]CUTCLIFFE JR. Methodological issues in grounded theory[J].Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000(31):1476-1484.
[13]SUDDABY R. From the editors:what grounded theory is not[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2006(49):633-642.
[14]张宝生,张庆普.基于扎根理论的知识型组织成员知识隐藏行为前因研究[J].科学进步与对策, 2017,10(34):105-110.
[15]杨冉冉,龙如银.基于扎根理论的城市居民绿色出行行为影响因素理论模型探讨[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,67(5):13-18.
[16]BANDURA A. Social learning theory[M]. New York:General Learning Press, 1977.
[17]廖成林,袁艺.基于社会认知理论的企业内知识分享行为研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2009(3):137-139.
[18]CUMMINGS J N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization[J].Management Science,2004,50(3):352-364.
[19]HSU M H, JU T L, YEN C H, et al. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities:the relationship between trust, self-efficacy,and outcome expectations[J].International Journal of HumanComputer Studies,2007,65(2):153-169.
[20]王斌,廖振鹏.基于三元交互理论ERP实施绩效及作用机理研究[J].软科学, 2011(6):49-53.