耕地多功能权衡与协同关系研究——以上海市青浦区为例
|
摘要
为识别耕地各功能的关联程度及在不同空间上的相关关系,基于土地利用变更调查数据和统计年鉴等数据,利用冷热点分析和偏相关分析等方法对上海市青浦区耕地的生产功能、生态功能和景观功能进行空间定量化分析并划分五类功能区,识别各分区及整个区域的空间关联。结果表明:(1)耕地各功能空间分布差异显著,东部各功能状况较好,北部较差。(2)生产功能主导区主要分布在东北部,生态功能的主导区分布在东南部,景观功能主导区分布在西南部和北部,各功能的低值区集中在西北部,无显著功能区集中在淀山湖周围。(3)在整个区域内,生产-生态功能,生产-景观功能呈协同关系,生态-景观功能呈权衡关系,相关关系与各功能主导区具有差别。结论:耕地各功能之间存在显著的权衡与协同关系,并在不同功能主导区有一定差异。通过分析耕地多功能的空间分布差异和相关性能够有针对性的进行分区保护,从而实现耕地的可持续利用。
Affected by the development of society and economy and people's needs,the cognition of cultivated land function has gradually changed from single production function to a synthesis of production function,ecological function,landscape function,social function and other functions. The multifunctionality of cultivated land has become a research hot spot issue. Many studies have focused on the evaluation and analysis of a single function,which lack of links between different functions. To identify the association degree of various functions of cultivated land and the correlation in different spaces,based on land utilization alteration data and statistical yearbook data,using cold hot spot analysis and partial correlation analysis to quantitatively analyze the production function,ecological function and landscape function of cultivated land in Qingpu District,Shanghai and classify five dominant functional areas to identify spatial association of whole district and each dominant functional areas.The results showed that:( 1) The spatial distribution of each function of cultivated land was significantly different. The distribution of production function and ecological function showed a trend of high in east and low in west,the landscape function was opposite,which was high in west and low in east. On the whole,the cultivated land multifunction was better in the east and the north was poor.( 2) Advantage area of production function,ecological function and landscape function were mainly distributed in the northeast,southeast,southwest and north,the inferior areas of all functions were concentrated in the northwest, no significant functional areas centered around Dianshan Lake.( 3) In the whole area,it showed a synergistic relationship in production-ecology function and production-landscape function, it had a trade-off relationship in ecology-landscape function, the correlation was obviously different in each dominant function area that compared with the whole area. The conclusion showed that: There were significant trade-offs and synergies relationship between the functions of cultivated land and some differences in each dominant functional region. By analyzing the spatial distribution differences and correlations of arable land various function,slowed down the trade-off relationship and enhanced the synergy relationship between multifunction and targeted protection can be carried out to achieve sustainable use of cultivated land.
Affected by the development of society and economy and people's needs,the cognition of cultivated land function has gradually changed from single production function to a synthesis of production function,ecological function,landscape function,social function and other functions. The multifunctionality of cultivated land has become a research hot spot issue. Many studies have focused on the evaluation and analysis of a single function,which lack of links between different functions. To identify the association degree of various functions of cultivated land and the correlation in different spaces,based on land utilization alteration data and statistical yearbook data,using cold hot spot analysis and partial correlation analysis to quantitatively analyze the production function,ecological function and landscape function of cultivated land in Qingpu District,Shanghai and classify five dominant functional areas to identify spatial association of whole district and each dominant functional areas.The results showed that:( 1) The spatial distribution of each function of cultivated land was significantly different. The distribution of production function and ecological function showed a trend of high in east and low in west,the landscape function was opposite,which was high in west and low in east. On the whole,the cultivated land multifunction was better in the east and the north was poor.( 2) Advantage area of production function,ecological function and landscape function were mainly distributed in the northeast,southeast,southwest and north,the inferior areas of all functions were concentrated in the northwest, no significant functional areas centered around Dianshan Lake.( 3) In the whole area,it showed a synergistic relationship in production-ecology function and production-landscape function, it had a trade-off relationship in ecology-landscape function, the correlation was obviously different in each dominant function area that compared with the whole area. The conclusion showed that: There were significant trade-offs and synergies relationship between the functions of cultivated land and some differences in each dominant functional region. By analyzing the spatial distribution differences and correlations of arable land various function,slowed down the trade-off relationship and enhanced the synergy relationship between multifunction and targeted protection can be carried out to achieve sustainable use of cultivated land.
引文
[1]赵华甫,张凤荣,许月卿,等.北京城市居民需要导向下的耕地功能保护[J].资源科学,2007,(1):56-62.ZHAO H F,ZHANG F R,XU Y Q,et al. Urban residents’needs-oriented functional protection of cultivated land in Beijing[J]. Resources Science,2007,(1):56-62.
[2]胡亚丹,徐建华,李治洪.上海市休闲农业布局及影响因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(12):2023-2031.HU Y D,XU J H,LI Z H. An analysis of the spatial pattern and influencing factors of leisure agriculture in Shanghai[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2017, 26(12):2023-2031.
[3] LOVELL S T. Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the united states[J]. Sustainability,2010,2(8):2499-2522.
[4]宋小青,欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(7):859-868.SONG X Q,OUYANG Z. Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection[J].Progress in Geography,2012,31(7):859-868.
[5]董涛,孔祥斌,谭敏,等.大都市边缘区基本农田功能特点及划定方法[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(12):32-37.DONG T,KONG X B,TAN M,et al. Functional features and identification methods of prime farmland in metropolitan suburbs[J]. China Land Science,2010,24(12):32-37.
[6]霍雅勤,蔡运龙,王瑛.耕地对农民的效用考察及耕地功能分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004(3):107-110.HUO Y Q,CAI Y L,WANG Y. Questionnaire investigation on cultivated land effectiveness for farmers and analysis of its function[J]. China Population Resources and Environment,2004(3):107-110.
[7]杨雪,谈明洪.近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(5):733-743.YANG X,TAN M H. Changes and relationships of arable land functions in Beijing in recent years[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(5):733-743.
[8]宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):435-447.SONG X Q,WU Z F,OUYANG Z. Changes of cultivated land function in China since 1949[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,69(4):435-447.
[9] WILSON G A. From ‘weak’to strong’multifunctionality:Conceptualizing farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2008(24):367-383.
[10]罗成,蔡银莺.湖北省农产品主产区耕地资源功能的时空演变[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):153-161.LUO C,CAI Y Y. The stage characteristics and spatial heterogeneity of cultivated land resource function evolution in agricultural producing areas of Hubei Province[J]. Economic Geography,2016,36(3):153-161.
[11]施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):247-257.SHI Y Y,ZHAO H F,YUN W J,et al. Analysis on spatial differentiation of arable land multifunction and socioeconomic coordination model in Beijing[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(2):247-257.
[12]陈星宇,王枫,李灿.珠三角地区耕地多功能空间差异与影响因素分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(1):130-136.CHEN X Y,WANG F,LI C. Spatial differences and influencing factors of arable land multifunction in Pearl River Delta[J]. Areal Research and Development,2017,36(1):130-136.
[13]宋小青,欧阳竹.中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):540-551.SONG X Q,OUYANG Z. Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2012,27(4):540-551.
[14]罗成.耕地资源功能属性的空间异质及管理模式研究——湖北省不同类型功能区实证[D].华中农业大学,2016.LUO C. The spatial heterogeneity for the multifunctionality of cultivated land resource and its management model:A case study of the different types of functional zones in Hubei Province[D]. Huazhong Agricultural University,2016.
[15]赵志尚.耕地多功能权衡与协同的时空变化研究——以湖北省为例[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017.ZAHO Z S. The temporal-spatial variation of trade-offs and synergies among cultivated land multi-functions:Taking Hubei Province as example[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2017.
[16] CLERGUE B,AMIAUD B,PERVANCHON F,et al. Biodiversity:function and assessment in agricultural areas:A review[J]. Agronomie,2009,25(1):6119-6125.
[17] RODRIGUEZ J P,BEARD T D,BENNETT E M,et al.Trade-offs across space,time,and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology&Society,2006,11(1):709-723.
[18]姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47.JIANG G H,ZHANG F R,KONG X B,et al. The different levels and the protection of multi-functions of cultivated land[J]. China Land Sciences,2011,25(8):42-47.
[19]董珑丽,李小平,姜雪,等.上海崇明岛水稻生产能耗与碳足迹生命周期评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(6):1254-1260.DONG L L,LI X P,JIANG X,et al. Assessment of energy consumption and carbon footprint of rice production using life cycle assessment method:Case study in Chongming Island,Shanghai[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014,33(6):1254-1260.
[20]田志会,刘瑞涵.北京市农田生态系统碳汇及释氧功能年际变化研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):68-71.TIAN Z H,LIU R H. Study on the internatianal variability of carbon sink and oxygen release function of farmland ecosystem in Beijing[J]. Ecological Economy,2016,32(1):68-71.
[21]《地表水环境质量标准基本项目标准限值》(GB 3838-2002)
[22] CHAPAGAIN A K,HOESTRA A Y. The green,blue and grey water footprint of rice from both a production and consumption perspective[J]. Value of Water Research Series,2010,70:749-758.
[23]陈帷胜,冯秀丽,马仁锋,等.耕地破碎度评价方法与实证研究——以浙江省宁波市为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(5):80-87.CHEN W S,FENG X L,MA R F,et al. Method of cultivated land fragmentation evaluation and empirical research:A case of ningbo city in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Sciences,2016,30(5):80-87.
[24]徐建华.计量地理学[M].高等教育出版社,2006.XU J H. Quantitative Geography[M]. Higher Education Press,2006
[25]彭建,刘志聪,刘焱序,等.京津冀地区县域耕地景观多功能性评价[J].生态学报,2016,(8):2274-2285.PENG J,LIU Z C, LIU Y X, et al. Assessment of farmland landscape multifunctionality at county level in Beijing-TianjinHubei Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,(8):2274-2285.
[26]王成,彭清,唐宁,等. 2005~2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究——以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(4):590-599.WANG C,PENG Q,TANG N,et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and the synergy and trade-off relationship of cultivated land multi-function in 2005-2015:A case of shapingba district,Chongqing City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(4):590-599.
[2]胡亚丹,徐建华,李治洪.上海市休闲农业布局及影响因素分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(12):2023-2031.HU Y D,XU J H,LI Z H. An analysis of the spatial pattern and influencing factors of leisure agriculture in Shanghai[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2017, 26(12):2023-2031.
[3] LOVELL S T. Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the united states[J]. Sustainability,2010,2(8):2499-2522.
[4]宋小青,欧阳竹.耕地多功能内涵及其对耕地保护的启示[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(7):859-868.SONG X Q,OUYANG Z. Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection[J].Progress in Geography,2012,31(7):859-868.
[5]董涛,孔祥斌,谭敏,等.大都市边缘区基本农田功能特点及划定方法[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(12):32-37.DONG T,KONG X B,TAN M,et al. Functional features and identification methods of prime farmland in metropolitan suburbs[J]. China Land Science,2010,24(12):32-37.
[6]霍雅勤,蔡运龙,王瑛.耕地对农民的效用考察及耕地功能分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004(3):107-110.HUO Y Q,CAI Y L,WANG Y. Questionnaire investigation on cultivated land effectiveness for farmers and analysis of its function[J]. China Population Resources and Environment,2004(3):107-110.
[7]杨雪,谈明洪.近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(5):733-743.YANG X,TAN M H. Changes and relationships of arable land functions in Beijing in recent years[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(5):733-743.
[8]宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹. 1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):435-447.SONG X Q,WU Z F,OUYANG Z. Changes of cultivated land function in China since 1949[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2014,69(4):435-447.
[9] WILSON G A. From ‘weak’to strong’multifunctionality:Conceptualizing farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2008(24):367-383.
[10]罗成,蔡银莺.湖北省农产品主产区耕地资源功能的时空演变[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):153-161.LUO C,CAI Y Y. The stage characteristics and spatial heterogeneity of cultivated land resource function evolution in agricultural producing areas of Hubei Province[J]. Economic Geography,2016,36(3):153-161.
[11]施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):247-257.SHI Y Y,ZHAO H F,YUN W J,et al. Analysis on spatial differentiation of arable land multifunction and socioeconomic coordination model in Beijing[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(2):247-257.
[12]陈星宇,王枫,李灿.珠三角地区耕地多功能空间差异与影响因素分析[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(1):130-136.CHEN X Y,WANG F,LI C. Spatial differences and influencing factors of arable land multifunction in Pearl River Delta[J]. Areal Research and Development,2017,36(1):130-136.
[13]宋小青,欧阳竹.中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):540-551.SONG X Q,OUYANG Z. Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2012,27(4):540-551.
[14]罗成.耕地资源功能属性的空间异质及管理模式研究——湖北省不同类型功能区实证[D].华中农业大学,2016.LUO C. The spatial heterogeneity for the multifunctionality of cultivated land resource and its management model:A case study of the different types of functional zones in Hubei Province[D]. Huazhong Agricultural University,2016.
[15]赵志尚.耕地多功能权衡与协同的时空变化研究——以湖北省为例[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2017.ZAHO Z S. The temporal-spatial variation of trade-offs and synergies among cultivated land multi-functions:Taking Hubei Province as example[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2017.
[16] CLERGUE B,AMIAUD B,PERVANCHON F,et al. Biodiversity:function and assessment in agricultural areas:A review[J]. Agronomie,2009,25(1):6119-6125.
[17] RODRIGUEZ J P,BEARD T D,BENNETT E M,et al.Trade-offs across space,time,and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology&Society,2006,11(1):709-723.
[18]姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47.JIANG G H,ZHANG F R,KONG X B,et al. The different levels and the protection of multi-functions of cultivated land[J]. China Land Sciences,2011,25(8):42-47.
[19]董珑丽,李小平,姜雪,等.上海崇明岛水稻生产能耗与碳足迹生命周期评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2014,33(6):1254-1260.DONG L L,LI X P,JIANG X,et al. Assessment of energy consumption and carbon footprint of rice production using life cycle assessment method:Case study in Chongming Island,Shanghai[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014,33(6):1254-1260.
[20]田志会,刘瑞涵.北京市农田生态系统碳汇及释氧功能年际变化研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):68-71.TIAN Z H,LIU R H. Study on the internatianal variability of carbon sink and oxygen release function of farmland ecosystem in Beijing[J]. Ecological Economy,2016,32(1):68-71.
[21]《地表水环境质量标准基本项目标准限值》(GB 3838-2002)
[22] CHAPAGAIN A K,HOESTRA A Y. The green,blue and grey water footprint of rice from both a production and consumption perspective[J]. Value of Water Research Series,2010,70:749-758.
[23]陈帷胜,冯秀丽,马仁锋,等.耕地破碎度评价方法与实证研究——以浙江省宁波市为例[J].中国土地科学,2016,30(5):80-87.CHEN W S,FENG X L,MA R F,et al. Method of cultivated land fragmentation evaluation and empirical research:A case of ningbo city in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Sciences,2016,30(5):80-87.
[24]徐建华.计量地理学[M].高等教育出版社,2006.XU J H. Quantitative Geography[M]. Higher Education Press,2006
[25]彭建,刘志聪,刘焱序,等.京津冀地区县域耕地景观多功能性评价[J].生态学报,2016,(8):2274-2285.PENG J,LIU Z C, LIU Y X, et al. Assessment of farmland landscape multifunctionality at county level in Beijing-TianjinHubei Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,(8):2274-2285.
[26]王成,彭清,唐宁,等. 2005~2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究——以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(4):590-599.WANG C,PENG Q,TANG N,et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and the synergy and trade-off relationship of cultivated land multi-function in 2005-2015:A case of shapingba district,Chongqing City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(4):590-599.